Suppr超能文献

额肌肌电图生物反馈与颈部肌电图生物反馈治疗肌肉收缩性头痛的比较

A comparison of frontal EMG biofeedback and neck EMG biofeedback in the treatment of muscle-contraction headache.

作者信息

Hart J D, Cichanski K A

出版信息

Biofeedback Self Regul. 1981 Mar;6(1):63-74. doi: 10.1007/BF00998794.

Abstract

EMG biofeedback from the frontal area (FFB) was compared to EMG biofeedback from the neck (NFB) in the treatment of chronic muscle-contraction headache. Both treatment groups (N = 10) evidenced significant decreases in reported headache activity, with the NFB group also significantly reducing medication consumption. An analysis of EMG changes suggested that subjects were able to produce large within-session changes in EMG activity during initial sessions, with the major effect of additional training being an increase in speed with which these changes occurred. In neither group, however, did changes in EMG activity correspond closely to changes in reported headache activity.

摘要

在慢性肌肉收缩性头痛的治疗中,对前额区域肌电图生物反馈(FFB)与颈部肌电图生物反馈(NFB)进行了比较。两个治疗组(每组10人)报告的头痛活动均显著减少,NFB组的药物消耗量也显著降低。肌电图变化分析表明,受试者在初始疗程中能够在疗程内使肌电图活动产生大幅变化,额外训练的主要作用是加快这些变化发生的速度。然而,两组中肌电图活动的变化均与报告的头痛活动变化没有密切对应关系。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验