Grassi C, Casali L, Rampulla C, Rossi A
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1981 Jul;19(7):297-302.
The authors studied the clinical activity of a synthetic theophylline derivative, (dl)-dihydro-1,8-dimethyl-1-3-(-2-methyl-butyl)-1 H-purine-2,6 dione, both after short-term treatment and in prevention of Exercise-Induced Asthma (EIA). The action of the new compound at two dosages was compared with that of anhydrous theophylline at a standard dose of 600 mg/day. The trial included 15 asthmatics, 11 males and 4 females, who showed EIA with reversible bronchospasm (improvement of at least 15% of FEV1 after administration of salbutamol at a dose of 200 mcg by means of a predosed aerosol). Asthma had been provoked by free running on a flat surface. The test was considered positive if the FEV1 was reduced at least by 20% compared with baseline level. Only 11 patients completed the protocol. In four cases the treatment had to be withdrawn due to the onset of adverse side effects. After 3 days of treatment, the drug caused a statistically significant improvement of FEV1 in comparison with baseline, but no difference from that caused by theophylline. Likewise no significant difference was noted between low and high doses of the tested drug. As regards the behavior of EIA under treatment, in 8 of 14 patients theophylline and the investigational drug proved equally effective. Two patients were protected only by theophylline, one only by the investigational drug, and three failed to be protected by either agent. The higher dose of the investigational drug protected against EIA in all the subjects protected by theophylline with one exception. Of the two doses tested, the lower one should be preferred since it has the same therapeutic effect without the most important side effects.
作者研究了一种合成茶碱衍生物(dl)-二氢-1,8-二甲基-1-3-(-2-甲基丁基)-1H-嘌呤-2,6-二酮在短期治疗以及预防运动诱发性哮喘(EIA)方面的临床活性。将该新化合物两种剂量的作用与标准剂量为600毫克/天的无水茶碱的作用进行了比较。该试验纳入了15名哮喘患者,其中11名男性和4名女性,这些患者表现出伴有可逆性支气管痉挛的EIA(通过预定量气雾剂给予200微克剂量的沙丁胺醇后,FEV1改善至少15%)。哮喘是通过在平坦表面上自由跑步诱发的。如果FEV1与基线水平相比至少降低20%,则该试验被认为是阳性的。只有11名患者完成了方案。在4例病例中,由于出现不良副作用,治疗不得不中止。治疗3天后,与基线相比,该药物使FEV1有统计学意义的改善,但与茶碱引起的改善无差异。同样,受试药物的低剂量和高剂量之间未观察到显著差异。至于治疗期间EIA的表现,在14名患者中的8名中,茶碱和受试药物被证明同样有效。2名患者仅受茶碱保护,1名仅受受试药物保护,3名患者两种药物均未能提供保护。受试药物的较高剂量在除1例之外的所有受茶碱保护的受试者中均能预防EIA。在测试的两种剂量中,应首选较低剂量,因为它具有相同的治疗效果且没有最重要的副作用。