Orenstein W A, Ross L, Overturf G D, Wilkins J, Redfield D R, Underman A
Am J Med Sci. 1981 Jul-Aug;282(1):27-33. doi: 10.1097/00000441-198107000-00004.
Intravenously administered ampicillin (AMP), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) and cefamandole (CEF) were evaluated in 30 children with shigellosis: 11 children received AMP, 10 TMP-SMX, and 9 CEF for a maximum of five days. Discharge criteria included; afebrile greater than 12 hrs, less than 9 stools/day, absence of seizures, and adequate oral intake. AMP or TMP-SMX patients required significantly fewer median days to meet discharge criteria than those who received CEF. AMP and TMP-SMX patients had fewer median days with fever (one day each) compared with CEF (five days). On day five, 7 of 8 CEF, 3 of 10 AMP and 2 of 9 TMP-SMX treated patients remained culture positive. Inhibitory concentrations against all Shigella isolates from CEF patients all were less than or equal to 0.4 microgram CEF/ml. Intravenous TMP-SMX was equivalent to AMP in treatment of children with shigellosis, while CEF was ineffective despite in vitro activity. Clinical and bacteriologic responses were achieved with AMP and TMP-SMX in the majority of patients with less than 5 days of intravenous therapy.
对30例志贺菌病患儿静脉注射氨苄西林(AMP)、甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑(TMP-SMX)和头孢孟多(CEF)进行评估:11例患儿接受AMP治疗,10例接受TMP-SMX治疗,9例接受CEF治疗,最长治疗5天。出院标准包括:发热消退超过12小时、每日排便少于9次、无惊厥发作且经口摄入量充足。与接受CEF治疗的患儿相比,接受AMP或TMP-SMX治疗的患儿达到出院标准所需的中位天数明显更少。与接受CEF治疗的患儿(5天)相比,接受AMP和TMP-SMX治疗的患儿发热的中位天数更少(均为1天)。在第5天,接受CEF治疗的8例患儿中有7例、接受AMP治疗的10例患儿中有3例、接受TMP-SMX治疗的9例患儿中有2例仍培养阳性。对所有来自CEF治疗患儿的志贺菌分离株的抑制浓度均小于或等于0.4微克CEF/毫升。静脉注射TMP-SMX在治疗志贺菌病患儿方面与AMP等效,而CEF尽管具有体外活性但无效。大多数患儿在接受少于5天的静脉治疗后,使用AMP和TMP-SMX取得了临床和细菌学反应。