Wake N, Slocum H K, Rustum Y M, Matsui S, Sandberg A A
Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1981 Jan;3(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/0165-4608(81)90050-9.
Mechanical and enzymatic disaggregation procedures have been utilized for the preparation of materials suitable for chromosome examination of tissues from various kinds of solid tumors. A great number of the cells disaggregated with the latter procedure were observed to attach to the bottom of culture flasks after 2 days in vitro; cells obtained with the former method were not attached. In general, the enzymatic procedure yielded a significantly larger number of viable cells that would undergo mitosis after short term culture and considerably improved the quality of banding as compared to the mechanical method. However, there were no significant differences among the basic karyotypes observed in the cells obtained by the mechanical approach versus those seen following the enzymatic method. This evidence, together with the high success rate of karyotyping in the enzyme-treated preparations, suggest that this should be the procedure of preference for cytogenetic examination of various tumors, particularly where in the past karyotypic examination has been very difficult, e.g., the early stages of tumor development.
机械解离和酶解程序已被用于制备适合对各种实体瘤组织进行染色体检查的材料。用后一种程序解离的大量细胞在体外培养2天后被观察到附着在培养瓶底部;用前一种方法获得的细胞没有附着。一般来说,与机械方法相比,酶解程序产生的活细胞数量显著更多,这些活细胞在短期培养后会进行有丝分裂,并且大大提高了显带质量。然而,通过机械方法获得的细胞与酶解方法获得的细胞中观察到的基本核型之间没有显著差异。这一证据,连同酶处理制剂中核型分析的高成功率,表明这应该是对各种肿瘤进行细胞遗传学检查的首选程序,特别是在过去核型分析非常困难的情况下,例如肿瘤发展的早期阶段。