Wolman S R
Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1983;2(3):257-93. doi: 10.1007/BF00048481.
Karyotypic progression may be viewed in at least two ways. One approach seeks evidence for increasing and progressive deviation from the normal chromosome pattern in tumors. The clearest examples, found in some leukemias, are those in which successive karyotypic changes are superimposed on an already aberrant cell population. Evidence of chromosomal progression within solid tumors is far less frequent, possibly because the tumors themselves are at a relatively late stage in their evolution. An alternative approach, therefore, attempts to correlate the extent of karyotypic deviation with other aspects of tumor progression. Recent data, based on classical cytogenetic analyses and flow cytometry, are presented to determine relationships between karyotype and specific origin and morphology of tumors. The predominant theme which emerges, not surprisingly, is that the more deviant chromosome patterns are associated with other measures of increased biologic malignancy. What is surprising is the degree to which these properties are expressed in primary tumors and the relative lack of evidence for further karyotypic evolution with recurrence or metastasis. Examples of genetic instability, evolution through polyploidy, gene amplification, and selection for specific chromosomal rearrangement are found in populations of premalignant and malignant human cells. There is increasing recognition of the importance of tumor-specific chromosome aberrations in the stepwise progression from the normal to the fully neoplastic cell.
核型进展至少可以从两种方式来看待。一种方法是寻找肿瘤中与正常染色体模式的偏差不断增加和进展的证据。在一些白血病中发现的最明显的例子是,连续的核型变化叠加在已经异常的细胞群体上。实体瘤中染色体进展的证据要少得多,这可能是因为肿瘤本身处于其进化的相对晚期。因此,另一种方法试图将核型偏差的程度与肿瘤进展的其他方面联系起来。基于经典细胞遗传学分析和流式细胞术的最新数据被呈现出来,以确定核型与肿瘤的特定起源和形态之间的关系。毫不奇怪,出现的主要主题是,越异常的染色体模式与生物学恶性程度增加的其他指标相关。令人惊讶的是,这些特性在原发性肿瘤中表达的程度,以及与复发或转移相关的进一步核型进化的证据相对缺乏。在癌前和恶性人类细胞群体中发现了遗传不稳定、通过多倍体进化、基因扩增以及对特定染色体重排的选择等例子。人们越来越认识到肿瘤特异性染色体畸变在从正常细胞向完全肿瘤细胞的逐步进展中的重要性。