Fraser J T
Int J Psychoanal. 1981;62(Pt 1):3-26.
Psychoanalytic practice has tacitly assumed the existence of an absolute and objective temporal matrix in which physical, biological and psychological processes take place and to which the subjective time of the patient in therapy gets gradually attuned. But psychoanalytic thought does not demand an ontology of absolute frameworks independent of man but only an epistemology in which several visions of reality are traditional. This paper reformulates the concept of time so as to accommodate three demands which appear to be mutually exclusive. The new concept of time (1) eliminates the need for assuming that it is a feature of the world independent of man, (2) retains the advantages of the heuristic assumption that, to first approximation, there does exist an objective passage of time and (3) does not contradict the teachings of other sciences about time. Careful attention to the feeling of the uncanny as it relates to time, together with considerations of the development of the sense of time suggests that our conscious evaluation of noetic time is directed and weighted by unconscious, archaic modes of time perception. These phylogenetically old forms of the sense of reality determine the temporal character of the unconscious. The dynamics of psychic energy invested in the various levels of time seems to determine the rates at which time is experienced as passing. The feeling that time passes at right rate probably corresponds to such combination of perceived causations and temporalities which do not threaten the integrity of the ego. If, because of internal or external danger or physiological dysfunction that balance changes, so does the sense of reality and with it, the affective texture of experienced time. Judged from this perspective, the reliability of reality testing is a measure of the degree to which the patient is able to accommodate the archaic reality of primitive causations and temporalities, lodged in his fantasy, memory and dreams, and integrate them with the ambiguities of human freedom.
精神分析实践一直默认存在一个绝对且客观的时间矩阵,物理、生物和心理过程在其中发生,治疗中患者的主观时间会逐渐与之协调。但精神分析思想并不要求有独立于人的绝对框架的本体论,而只要求一种认识论,在这种认识论中,几种现实观是传统的。本文重新阐述了时间概念,以满足三个看似相互排斥的要求。新的时间概念(1)消除了假定时间是独立于人的世界特征的必要性,(2)保留了启发式假设的优点,即大致来说,确实存在客观的时间流逝,(3)不与其他科学关于时间的教义相矛盾。仔细关注与时间相关的离奇感,以及对时间感发展的思考表明,我们对智性时间的有意识评估是由无意识的、古老的时间感知模式引导和加权的。这些系统发育上古老的现实感形式决定了无意识的时间特征。投入到不同时间层面的心理能量动态似乎决定了时间流逝的体验速率。时间以合适速率流逝的感觉可能对应于这样一种感知因果关系和时间性的组合,即不会威胁自我的完整性。如果由于内部或外部危险或生理功能障碍,这种平衡发生变化,现实感也会随之改变,与之相伴的还有体验时间的情感质地。从这个角度判断,现实检验的可靠性是衡量患者能够在多大程度上接纳存在于其幻想、记忆和梦境中的原始因果关系和时间性的古老现实,并将它们与人类自由的模糊性整合起来的程度的指标。