Vaskilampi T
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1981;29(2):187-97.
The article considers the sociological aspects of community based health intervention programmes using the North Karelia Project as an example. Health programmes are still in the process of institutionalisation. This means that unlike long established disciplines they do not yet have a well-established methodology, clear research evaluation criteria, or known laws or invariances. The social characteristics of health intervention programmes are considered. They may be regarded as action research. A basic dilemma in the aims of health intervention programmes is emphasized; on the one hand to produce a change in the behavior and health status of the population, and on the other hand to discover the laws or invariances, governing them. The solution of this conflict affects the goals, methods and organisation of the programme and is also important in the evaluation of the outcome. The North Karelia Project, like other health intervention programme was launched and given legal force for medical reasons based on epidemiological research into risk factors. However, behaviour affecting health involves many other dimensions than the medical one. The social determinants and functions of health behaviours, and the role of health intervention as an agent of social control are discussed. Finally, the results and evaluation of this community level health intervention programmes are discussed and their practical implications are considered.
本文以北卡累利阿项目为例,探讨了基于社区的健康干预项目的社会学层面。健康项目仍处于制度化进程中。这意味着,与长期确立的学科不同,它们尚未拥有完善的方法论、明确的研究评估标准,也没有已知的规律或不变性。文中考量了健康干预项目的社会特征。它们可被视为行动研究。文中强调了健康干预项目目标中的一个基本困境;一方面要促使人群的行为和健康状况发生改变,另一方面要发现支配这些行为和状况的规律或不变性。解决这一冲突会影响项目的目标、方法和组织,在结果评估中也很重要。北卡累利阿项目与其他健康干预项目一样,基于对风险因素的流行病学研究,出于医学原因启动并获得了法律效力。然而,影响健康的行为涉及的维度远不止医学维度。文中讨论了健康行为的社会决定因素和功能,以及健康干预作为社会控制手段的作用。最后,文中讨论了这一社区层面健康干预项目的结果和评估,并考量了其实际意义。