Schmidt P
Ann Med Psychol (Paris). 1981 May;139(5):497-511.
This paper is elaborated in the same order of those who developpe the idea that, Psychosis is pleaded as an alibi of a totalitarian reality (Psychosis alibi). So it may allow to disengage the evolution of the Psychiatry outside of the anti-psychiatry ideologies. The main subject of this work, is to analyse the gap between the Reality which includes the psychosis as a part of herself (Psychosis as disease). On the second hand the Reality of the psychosis from the psycho-pathologic point of view (delirium, hallucinations, autism, etc...). Considering the importance of the formal grammatical functions in the linguistic matter to site the reference to the reality according to the rules of the communication and the oral expression; so we propose a grammatical analysis. Two parts are distinguishable in this work. The first part concerns a review of languages proposed in different psychiatric "theorization" established previously about mental disorder. So it could be considered that the psychosis is the one who "speaks" the psychiatry. The second part concerns an abstract of the "semiotiques" studies by which we can tackle the psychosis with a scientific language: The Psychiatric "speaking" the psychosis not the opposite. This way of analyse allows to realize the modifications in the part of both protagonists in the game. By the same way, it authorizes to introduce the psychiatry from the axiomatic point of view, allowing a self-contained definition as a branch of the medicine, and disengaging his subject: The psychosis; as a syntactic subject.
本文按照那些提出以下观点的人的思路展开，即精神病被用作极权主义现实的托辞（精神病托辞）。因此，这可能有助于在反精神病学意识形态之外厘清精神病学的发展脉络。这项工作的主要主题是分析包含精神病作为自身一部分的现实（作为疾病的精神病）与从心理病理学角度看的精神病现实（妄想、幻觉、自闭症等）之间的差距。考虑到形式语法功能在语言问题中的重要性，以便根据交流和口头表达规则确定对现实的参照；因此我们提出一种语法分析。这项工作可分为两个部分。第一部分涉及对先前关于精神障碍的不同精神病学“理论化”中提出的语言进行综述。所以可以认为精神病是“讲述”精神病学的主体。第二部分涉及“符号学”研究的摘要，通过这些研究我们可以用科学语言探讨精神病：是精神病学“讲述”精神病，而非相反。这种分析方式有助于认识游戏中双方主角的变化。同样，它允许从公理角度引入精神病学，给出作为医学分支的自足定义，并厘清其主题：精神病；作为一个句法主体。
