Rango N
J Med Educ. 1981 Dec;56(12):994-1003. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198112000-00003.
This paper examines the curricular response of colleges and universities to conflict among scientific and medical experts regarding the application of professional knowledge and technical expertise to public policy and patient care. Two types of interdisciplinary science programs now exist on many campuses: those that attempt to increase the "scientific literacy" of humanities and social science students and those that try to enrich the "social consciousness" of physical and life science students. An alternative philosophy of education is proposed that is based on three objectives: to introduce the logical processes for establishing causes in the health sciences; to identify limits of scientific and technical knowledge in health-related areas; and to develop familiarity with problems of decision-making under conditions of scientific or clinical uncertainty. Illustrative cases in clinical medicine and public health suggest how to apply this educational philosophy. The paper concludes by observing that premedical education reform is impossible without redefining the "liberal arts" tradition of undergraduate education.
本文探讨了高校课程对于科学和医学专家在将专业知识和技术专长应用于公共政策及患者护理方面存在的冲突所做出的反应。如今许多校园里存在两种跨学科科学项目:一种试图提高人文和社会科学专业学生的“科学素养”,另一种则试图增强物理和生命科学专业学生的“社会意识”。本文提出了一种基于三个目标的教育理念:介绍在健康科学领域确定病因的逻辑过程;明确健康相关领域科学技术知识的局限性;培养在科学或临床不确定性条件下对决策问题的熟悉度。临床医学和公共卫生领域的实例表明了如何应用这一教育理念。本文最后指出,如果不重新定义本科教育的“文科”传统,医学预科教育改革是不可能实现的。