Wist E R, Hennerici M, Dichgans J
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1978 Dec;41(12):1069-77. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.41.12.1069.
The results of a study in which visual evoked responses (VERs) and a modified Pulfrich method were compared showed that both methods are very effective for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. With VERs, 97% of the multiple sclerosis cases were diagnosed correctly, while the corresponding value for the Pulfrich method was 93%. In contrast to VERs, the Pulfrich method allows only measurement of latency differences between the two visual pathways. This method involves measuring the speed required to cause a shift in the apparent depth location of a large, moving, striped pattern observed with a neutral density filter over one eye. A pathological transmission time was inferred when the patients observed a shift in the depth of the moving pattern either without any filter at all or with a filter whose attentuation was no more than 0.2 log units. A further criterion for pathology was a difference of more than 10% between the two eyes in the retinal speed required for a depth displacement using a 1.5 log unit filter. This test requires about 15 minutes, and can be carried out by a technical assistant.
一项比较视觉诱发电位(VERs)和改良普尔弗里希方法的研究结果表明,这两种方法对多发性硬化症的诊断都非常有效。使用VERs时,97%的多发性硬化症病例被正确诊断,而普尔弗里希方法的相应诊断率为93%。与VERs不同,普尔弗里希方法只能测量两条视觉通路之间的潜伏期差异。该方法包括测量通过在一只眼睛上使用中性密度滤光片观察到的大的、移动的条纹图案的表观深度位置发生偏移所需的速度。当患者在完全不使用任何滤光片或使用衰减不超过0.2对数单位的滤光片时观察到移动图案深度的偏移时,推断存在病理性传输时间。病理学的另一个标准是使用1.5对数单位滤光片时,两眼之间导致深度位移所需的视网膜速度差异超过10%。该测试大约需要15分钟,可由技术助理进行。