Weinert C, Wehner T
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 1981 Nov;20(4):170-6.
The present study deals with the question whether there are differences between disabled (n = 83) and non-disabled (n = 32) subjects concerning their ratings of (a) their subjective confidence in their potential for occupational activities and (b) the anticipated requirements of their intended jobs. No statistical differences have been found. Thalidomide-affected subjects however tend to choose an occupation the anticipated requirements of which are identical with their own subjective confidence in potential skills while ablebodied subjects ascribe themselves a wider range of potential skills their intended jobs. No statistical differences have been found. Thalidomide-affected subjects however tend to choose an occupation the anticipated requirements of which are identical with their own subjective confidence in potential skills while ablebodied subjects ascribe themselves a wider range of potential skills their intended jobs. No statistical differences have been found. Thalidomide-affected subjects however tend to choose an occupation the anticipated requirements of which are identical with their own subjective confidence in potential skills while ablebodied subjects ascribe themselves a wider range of potential skills and abilities, beyond those required by the chosen job. The second emphasis of the study dealt with the effects of the "induced" occurrence of events unrelated to the training itself on the remaining preparedness for activity (frustration tolerance). Disabled subjects demonstrate significantly higher frustration ratings in the "reactions of attachment figures" factor than the control subjects. This does however not diminish their preparedness for activity (i.e. to train for the chosen occupation). The study is based on the choice of occupation behaviour questionnaires by Bender-Szymanski (1976).
本研究探讨了残疾受试者（n = 83）和非残疾受试者（n = 32）在以下方面的评分是否存在差异：（a）他们对自身职业活动潜力的主观信心；（b）对预期工作的要求。未发现统计学差异。然而，受沙利度胺影响的受试者倾向于选择预期要求与自身对潜在技能的主观信心相符的职业，而身体健全的受试者认为自己具备比预期工作所需更广泛的潜在技能。未发现统计学差异。然而，受沙利度胺影响的受试者倾向于选择预期要求与自身对潜在技能的主观信心相符的职业，而身体健全的受试者认为自己具备比所选工作要求更广泛的潜在技能和能力。本研究的第二个重点是与训练本身无关的“诱发”事件的发生对剩余活动准备（挫折耐受力）的影响。在“依恋人物的反应”因素方面，残疾受试者的挫折评分显著高于对照组受试者。然而，这并未削弱他们的活动准备（即为所选职业进行训练的准备）。本研究基于Bender - Szymanski（1976）的职业选择行为问卷。
