Seligman S J
Am J Med. 1981 Dec;71(6):941-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(81)90304-1.
Antibiotic cost control programs are important; however, they may be difficult to implement if they include intensive involvement of infectious diseases specialists. In a large municipal hospital, review of antibiotic cost data indicated that 31 percent of the total antibiotic expenditure was for an oral cephalosporin, cephalexin. The requirement that an antibiotic justification form be completed did not decrease use of the drug. However, the requirement that the prescribing physician telephone an infectious diseases specialist resulted in marked restriction of the oral cephalosporin and was accompanied by a 29 percent reduction (adjusted for inflation) in total antibiotic costs. Since comparatively few telephone requests were made and since the decision process to use an oral cephalosporin is comparatively simple, marked reduction in antibiotic costs was achieved with relatively little effort by the infectious disease expert.
抗生素成本控制项目很重要;然而,如果这些项目需要传染病专家深度参与,可能就难以实施。在一家大型市级医院,对抗生素成本数据的审查表明,抗生素总支出的31%用于口服头孢菌素类药物头孢氨苄。要求填写抗生素使用理由表格并没有减少该药物的使用。然而,要求开处方的医生给传染病专家打电话则导致口服头孢菌素类药物的使用受到显著限制,同时抗生素总成本降低了29%(已根据通货膨胀进行调整)。由于打电话咨询的请求相对较少,而且使用口服头孢菌素类药物的决策过程相对简单,传染病专家只需付出相对较少的努力就能实现抗生素成本的显著降低。