• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Loudness discomfort levels of hearing-impaired listeners using speech material.

作者信息

Edgerton B J, Beattie R C, Wides J W

出版信息

Ear Hear. 1980 Jul-Aug;1(4):206-10. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198007000-00005.

DOI:10.1097/00003446-198007000-00005
PMID:7409357
Abstract

This study was undertaken to: (1) investigate the effects of speech materials on the loudness discomfort level (LDL); (2) assess the intrasession stability among three LDL trials; and (3) examine the relationships between the speech LDL and the pure-tone and spondee thresholds. Ninety-six adults with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss were tested. Findings showed little or no difference among five commercially available speech materials. Thus, it was concluded that differences in speech materials do not comprise a major source of variability among studies when comparing mean LDL data. Group means may, however, obscure significant individual variations in LDL's that result from differing speech materials. Considerable LDL variability among listeners with similar thresholds was found, suggesting an intolerably high error rate for predictive purposes.

摘要

相似文献

1
Loudness discomfort levels of hearing-impaired listeners using speech material.
Ear Hear. 1980 Jul-Aug;1(4):206-10. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198007000-00005.
2
Loudness discomfort level for speech: comparison of two instructional sets for saturation sound pressure level selection.
Ear Hear. 1980 Jul-Aug;1(4):197-205.
3
Effect of sensorineural hearing loss on loudness discomfort level and most comfortable loudness judgments.
J Speech Hear Res. 1978 Dec;21(4):668-81. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2104.668.
4
Relationship between loudness discomfort level and acoustic reflex threshold for normal and sensorineural hearing-impaired individuals.
J Speech Hear Res. 1979 Dec;22(4):873-83. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2204.873.
5
Speech recognition performance at loudness discomfort level.响度不适阈下的语音识别性能。
Scand Audiol. 1981;10(4):239-46. doi: 10.3109/01050398109076187.
6
The controversial relationship between loudness discomfort levels and acoustic reflex thresholds.响度不适阈与听反射阈之间存在争议的关系。
J Am Audiol Soc. 1979 Jan-Feb;4(4):123-31.
7
Loudness summation of equal loud narrowband signals in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.正常听力和听力受损受试者中相等响度窄带信号的响度总和
Int J Audiol. 2018 Jun;57(sup3):S71-S80. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1380848. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
8
Relationship between pure-tone and speech loudness discomfort levels among hearing-impaired subjects.听力受损受试者的纯音与言语响度不适阈之间的关系。
J Speech Hear Disord. 1986 May;51(2):120-5. doi: 10.1044/jshd.5102.120.
9
Pure-Tone-Spondee Threshold Relationships in Functional Hearing Loss: A Test of Loudness Contribution.功能性听力损失中的纯音-扬扬格阈关系:响度贡献测试
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Jan 1;60(1):136-143. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-H-15-0330.
10
Effects of bandwidth and stimulus type on most comfortable loudness levels of hearing-impaired listeners.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1986 Aug;80(2):484-93. doi: 10.1121/1.394044.