Suppr超能文献

几种用于量化犬氮血症的实验室检测方法的比较。

Comparison of several laboratory tests for quantifying azotaemia in dogs.

作者信息

Watson A D, McDonald P J

出版信息

Aust Vet J. 1981 Sep;57(9):407-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1981.tb00543.x.

Abstract

Fifty blood samples collected from 14 normal dogs and 11 dogs with renal disease and azotaemia were assayed in various ways for urea and creatinine. Urea concentrations measured by Azostix, Urastrat and Unitest correlated well with a reference urea assay method, and there was good correlation between creatinine concentrations determined by Unitest and a reference method. The performance of the four simpler laboratory procedures examined was considered satisfactory for clinical purposes.

摘要

从14只正常犬和11只患有肾病及氮血症的犬身上采集了50份血样,以多种方式对尿素和肌酐进行了检测。用Azostix、Urastrat和Unitest检测的尿素浓度与参考尿素检测方法相关性良好,Unitest测定的肌酐浓度与参考方法之间也有良好的相关性。所检测的四种更简便的实验室检测方法的性能被认为对于临床目的而言是令人满意的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验