McKechnie A A, Philip A E, Ramage J G
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1981 Oct;31(231):611-4.
We compare referrals made to a psychiatric service by two comparable general practices. One practice made its referrals through conventional channels; the other referred patients to a multi-professional team who saw patients at a clinic held on the practice premises. The members of the team and the general practitioners in the second practice also met regularly to discuss matters of mutual interest. More patients were referred by this method, which also made greater use of the multiple disciplines involved in psychiatric care.Patients referred through conventional channels were more likely to have had previous contact with the psychiatric service, were more likely to be admitted to hospital and spent 70 per cent more time as inpatients.These results confirm the findings of other workers in demonstrating that there are tangible benefits in a multidisciplinary specialist team working in primary care.
我们比较了两家类似的普通诊所转介到精神科服务的情况。一家诊所通过传统渠道进行转介;另一家则将患者转介给一个多专业团队,该团队在诊所内的场所为患者看病。第二家诊所的团队成员和全科医生也定期会面,讨论共同关心的问题。通过这种方法转介的患者更多,并且在精神科护理中更多地利用了多个学科。通过传统渠道转介的患者更有可能之前就与精神科服务有过接触,更有可能住院,并且住院时间多出70%。这些结果证实了其他研究人员的发现,表明多学科专科团队在初级保健中工作有切实的好处。