Land C E
Environ Health Perspect. 1981 Dec;42:15-21. doi: 10.1289/ehp.814215.
The statistical difficulties of estimating cancer risks from low doses of a carcinogen are illustrated by examples from radiation carcinogenesis. Although more is known about dose-response relationships for ionizing radiation than for any other environmental carcinogen, estimates of cancer risk from low radiation doses have been extremely controversial; disagreements by factors of 100 or more are not uncommon. Direct estimation, based on data from populations exposed to low doses, is usually impracticable because of sample size requirements. Curve-fitting analyses, by which higher dose data determine lower dose risk estimates, require simple dose-response models if the estimates are to be statistically stable. The current level of knowledge about biological mechanisms of carcinogenesis dose not usually permit the confident assumption of a simple model, however; thus frequently the choice is between unstable risk estimates obtained using general models and statistically stable estimates whose stability depends on arbitrary model assumptions.
辐射致癌的例子说明了从低剂量致癌物估算癌症风险的统计学难题。尽管对于电离辐射的剂量反应关系的了解比对任何其他环境致癌物都要多,但低辐射剂量致癌风险的估算一直极具争议;相差100倍甚至更多的分歧并不罕见。基于低剂量暴露人群的数据进行直接估算,通常因样本量要求而不切实际。如果要使估算在统计上稳定,通过高剂量数据确定低剂量风险估算的曲线拟合分析需要简单的剂量反应模型。然而,目前关于致癌生物学机制的知识水平通常不允许自信地假设一个简单模型;因此,通常的选择是在使用通用模型获得的不稳定风险估算与稳定性取决于任意模型假设的统计稳定估算之间进行抉择。