Hsu Y T, Nelson D L
Am J Occup Ther. 1981 Dec;35(12):788-91. doi: 10.5014/ajot.35.12.788.
Researchers and clinicians working with various adult populations have no practical, complete, reliable, and valid method of measuring the tactile and kinesthetic functions of their clients. This study gathers preliminary normative information on the performance of adults on the Southern California Kinesthesia and Tactile Tests. Fifty-one normal men and women with a mean age of 26 years were administered the Kinesthesia, Manual Form Perception, Finger Indentification, Graphesthesia, Localization of Tactile Stimuli, and Double Tactile Stimuli Tests in the order in which they were standardized. Test-retest reliability was studied in 41 of these subjects. Results indicated that the assessment of normal adults was hampered by ceiling effects and by low reliability, but that these six tests might well serve a useful function in discriminating between relatively severe dysfunction and normal function in adults. Suggestions were made toward the development of new measurement instruments specifically designed for adults.
针对不同成年人群开展研究和临床工作的人员,没有实用、完整、可靠且有效的方法来测量其客户的触觉和动觉功能。本研究收集了成年人在南加州动觉和触觉测试中的初步常模信息。对51名平均年龄为26岁的正常男性和女性按照标准化顺序进行了动觉、手工形状感知、手指识别、图形觉、触觉刺激定位和双重触觉刺激测试。对其中41名受试者进行了重测信度研究。结果表明,正常成年人的评估受到天花板效应和低信度的阻碍,但这六项测试在区分成年人相对严重的功能障碍和正常功能方面可能具有有益作用。针对专门为成年人设计的新测量工具的开发提出了建议。