Krüger G R, Grisar T, Lennert K, Schwarze E W, Brittinger G
Blut. 1981 Sep;43(3):167-81. doi: 10.1007/BF00363887.
Using the Kiel and the Rappaport classifications, a comparative histopathological analysis of 486 cases with non-Hodgkin lymphomas from a prospective study of the Kiel Lymphoma Study Group, still in progress, was performed. The greater part of Rappaport's classical lymphoma entities was found to be inhomogeneous and to include tumors of considerable prognostic heterogeneity, as shown by differences in actuarial survival. Some of the Kiel lymphoma entities have been identified in several lymphoma types of the Rappaport classification, indicating that "translation" of one scheme into the other is difficult or impossible. In addition, centrocytic lymphoma of the Kiel classification may not be homogeneous. On the whole, the Kiel classification appears to be superior to the original Rappaport classification in categorizing the various prognostically diverse types of non-Hodgkin lymphomas.
运用基尔（Kiel）分类法和拉帕波特（Rappaport）分类法，对基尔淋巴瘤研究组一项仍在进行的前瞻性研究中的486例非霍奇金淋巴瘤病例进行了比较组织病理学分析。结果发现，拉帕波特经典淋巴瘤实体的大部分是不均一的，并且包含预后具有相当大异质性的肿瘤，精算生存率的差异就表明了这一点。基尔分类法中的一些淋巴瘤实体在拉帕波特分类法的几种淋巴瘤类型中都有发现，这表明将一种分类法“转换”为另一种分类法是困难的或不可能的。此外，基尔分类法中的中心细胞淋巴瘤可能也不是均一的。总体而言，在对各种预后不同的非霍奇金淋巴瘤类型进行分类时，基尔分类法似乎优于最初的拉帕波特分类法。
