Calhoun R E, Hutchison S L
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1981;13(2):89-98. doi: 10.2190/LFUA-4KR0-B0QX-M584.
The purpose of the present study was to test the findings of Botwinick's work on cautiousness and decision-making in old age [1,2], along with an examination of two factors not previously studied: rigidity and certainty of decision outcome. Sixty-four elderly participants of both sexes participated in filling out the Choice Dilemmas Questionnaire (CDQ) after having been classified as high or low on Schaie's Test of Behavioral Rigidity [3]. In general, Botwinick's conclusions were supported: 1. when given the opportunity to avoid making decisions on the CDQ, the elderly did so, even under conditions of no risk at all concerning the outcome of the decision; 2. elderly individuals appeared to become more conservative and cautious in their decisions when the outcome was directed at the lives of young individuals than when older individual's lifestyles were of concern. This latter phenomenon, however was not seen when the elderly participant was required to make a decision and could not elect to abstain. In addition, rigidity was found to be related to risky decisions made by the elderly individual.
本研究的目的是验证博特温尼克关于老年人谨慎性和决策制定的研究结果[1,2],同时考察两个此前未被研究的因素:僵化程度和决策结果的确定性。64名老年男女参与者在被施艾行为僵化测试[3]评定为高或低后,参与填写了选择困境问卷(CDQ)。总体而言,博特温尼克的结论得到了支持:1. 当有机会避免在CDQ上做决策时,老年人会这样做,即使在决策结果毫无风险的情况下;2. 当决策结果涉及年轻人的生命时,老年个体在决策中似乎比在关注老年人生活方式时变得更加保守和谨慎。然而,当老年参与者被要求做出决策且不能选择弃权时,后一种现象并未出现。此外,发现僵化程度与老年个体做出的风险决策有关。