• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

听力受损老年人群中半列表与全列表言语辨别分数的比较。

A comparison of half- vs full-list speech discrimination scores in a hearing-impaired geriatric population.

作者信息

Penrod J P

出版信息

J Aud Res. 1980 Jul;20(3):181-6.

PMID:7347739
Abstract

Speech discrimination testing using a recorded List A of the CID W-22 test was completed on 76 elderly persons with varying degrees of sensorineural hearing impairment. Half- and full-list scores were compared and the statistical analysis provided support for half-list testing with this population. Variability in scores was discussed relative to expected variation based on previous data by Thornton and Raffin (1978). Recommendations were made concerning alternatives to the presentation of the entire 50-item list.

摘要

使用CID W-22测试的录音A表对76名患有不同程度感音神经性听力损失的老年人进行了言语辨别测试。比较了半张列表和整张列表的得分,统计分析为该人群的半张列表测试提供了支持。根据Thornton和Raffin(1978年)以前的数据,讨论了得分的变异性与预期变异性的关系。针对呈现完整的50项列表的替代方案提出了建议。

相似文献

1
A comparison of half- vs full-list speech discrimination scores in a hearing-impaired geriatric population.听力受损老年人群中半列表与全列表言语辨别分数的比较。
J Aud Res. 1980 Jul;20(3):181-6.
2
Comparison of speech detection and spondee thresholds and half- versus full-list intelligibility scores with MLV and taped presentations of NU-6.使用MLV和NU-6的录音呈现方式比较语音检测和扬扬格阈值以及半列表与全列表可懂度得分。
J Am Audiol Soc. 1978 May-Jun;3(6):267-72.
3
Monaural vs binaural speech reception threshold and word discrimination scores in the hearing impaired.听力受损者的单耳与双耳言语接受阈及单词辨别分数
J Aud Res. 1981 Apr;21(2):133-5.
4
Audibility-index predictions of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' performance on the connected speech test.正常听力和听力受损听众在连贯言语测试中的可听度指数预测。
Ear Hear. 2003 Feb;24(1):71-88. doi: 10.1097/01.AUD.0000052748.94309.8A.
5
A comparison of speech discrimination scores by using PB-50 lists and the speech discrimination scale with hearing-impaired adults.使用PB - 50列表和言语辨别量表对听力受损成年人的言语辨别分数进行比较。
J Aud Res. 1978 Jul;18(3):153-64.
6
Part- vs full-list performance on the NST by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults.正常听力和听力受损成年人在非言语声测试中的部分列表与完整列表表现。
J Aud Res. 1985 Jul;25(3):143-8.
7
Speech reception thresholds using conventional vs high-frequency spondees in normals and in subjects with marked high-frequency sensorineural loss.
J Aud Res. 1985 Apr;25(2):133-42.
8
Perception of synthetic speech sounds by hearing-impaired listeners.听力受损听众对合成语音的感知。
J Aud Res. 1980 Jul;20(3):187-203.
9
[Physical diagnostic procedures: whispered speech and tuning fork test].
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1998 Aug 8;142(32):1816-9.
10
Speech and language development in a population of Swedish hearing-impaired pre-school children, a cross-sectional study.瑞典听力受损学龄前儿童群体的言语和语言发展:一项横断面研究
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 Jul;71(7):1061-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2007.03.016. Epub 2007 May 18.