Suppr超能文献

当前患有精神疾病患者终生诊断和症状的可靠性。

Reliability of lifetime diagnoses and symptoms in patients with a current psychiatric disorder.

作者信息

Keller M B, Lavori P W, McDonald-Scott P, Scheftner W A, Andreasen N C, Shapiro R W, Croughan J

出版信息

J Psychiatr Res. 1981;16(4):229-40. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(81)90017-0.

Abstract

In this study we assess the reliability of rating past psychiatric symptoms and lifetime diagnoses in a currently ill population using the SADS and RDC. Five raters from different centers interviewed 25 subjects in a short-interval test-retest design. Subjects had a wide diversity of affective and non-affective diagnoses and high levels of manifest psychopathology. Our results demonstrate that it is possible for raters from different research centers to reliably rate lifetime diagnoses and previous symptoms. Two important exceptions to the high reliability are the lifetime diagnoses of hypomania and the recurrent unipolar subtype of major depressive disorder, and we alert clinicians and researchers to be cautious when diagnosing these conditions. We conclude that the next step in measuring reliability should be a long-interval test-retest design with separate interviews conducted at the later assessment, one by the original rater and the other by a blind rater.

摘要

在本研究中,我们使用情感障碍和精神分裂症访谈提纲(SADS)及研究诊断标准(RDC)评估在当前患病群体中对既往精神症状及终生诊断进行评分的可靠性。来自不同中心的5名评估者采用短间隔重测设计对25名受试者进行了访谈。受试者有多种情感性和非情感性诊断,且有高水平的明显精神病理学表现。我们的结果表明,来自不同研究中心的评估者有可能可靠地对终生诊断及既往症状进行评分。高可靠性的两个重要例外情况是轻躁狂的终生诊断以及重度抑郁症的复发性单相亚型,我们提醒临床医生和研究人员在诊断这些疾病时要谨慎。我们得出结论,测量可靠性的下一步应该是采用长间隔重测设计,在后期评估时进行单独访谈,一次由最初的评估者进行,另一次由盲法评估者进行。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验