Suppr超能文献

门诊医疗:内科医生与家庭全科医生的比较

Ambulatory medical care: a comparison of internists and family-general practitioners.

作者信息

Noren J, Frazier T, Altman I, DeLozier J

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 1980 Jan 3;302(1):11-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198001033020103.

Abstract

We analyzed data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey to compare the style of practice of two primary-care providers, general internists and family-general practitioners. Whereas internists spent 18.4 minutes with the average patient, family-general practitioners spent 13.0 minutes. Whereas internists used laboratory tests in 73 per cent of visits and x-ray tests in 53 per cent, family-general practitioners used these studies in 34 and 19 per cent of visits. Internists provided instructions regarding health problems in 17.8 per cent of visits, and family-general practitioners in 12.4 per cent. The two provider groups did not differ in terms of therapy for emotional problems, both providing it in a relatively low proportion of visits (3 per cent). Whether by choice or necessity, family-general practitioners spent less time examining and instructing patients, and they ordered fewer laboratory and x-ray studies. The implications of these differences for the cost and quality of primary care need further study.

摘要

我们分析了来自国家门诊医疗调查的数据,以比较两类初级保健提供者(普通内科医生和家庭全科医生)的执业方式。内科医生平均每位患者问诊18.4分钟,而家庭全科医生为13.0分钟。内科医生在73%的就诊中使用实验室检查,53%的就诊中使用X光检查,而家庭全科医生在34%和19%的就诊中使用这些检查。内科医生在17.8%的就诊中就健康问题提供指导,家庭全科医生为12.4%。两组提供者在情感问题治疗方面没有差异,在相对较少比例的就诊中提供此类治疗(3%)。无论是出于选择还是必要,家庭全科医生花在检查和指导患者上的时间较少,他们开出的实验室和X光检查也较少。这些差异对初级保健成本和质量的影响需要进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验