• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三里岛事故的放射性烟羽:距离事故地点375公里处空气中的氙-133

Radioactive plume from the Three Mile Island accident: xenon-133 in air at a distance of 375 kilometers.

作者信息

Wahlen M, Kunz C O, Matuszek J M, Mahoney W E, Thompson R C

出版信息

Science. 1980 Feb 8;207(4431):639-40. doi: 10.1126/science.7352276.

DOI:10.1126/science.7352276
PMID:7352276
Abstract

The transit of an air mass containing radioactive gas released from the Three Mile Island reactor was recorded in Albany, New York, by measuring xenon-133. These measurements provide an evaluation of Three Mile Island effluents to distances greater than 100 kilometers. Two independent techniques identified xenon-133 in ambient air at concentrations as high as 3900 picocuries per cubic meter. The local gamma-ray whole-body dose from the passing radioactivity amounted to 0.004 millirem, or 0.004 percent of the annual dose from natural sources.

摘要

通过测量氙-133,在纽约州奥尔巴尼记录了含有三里岛反应堆释放的放射性气体的气团过境情况。这些测量结果评估了三里岛排放物扩散到100多公里以外的情况。两种独立技术在环境空气中检测到了氙-133,其浓度高达每立方米3900皮居里。过往放射性物质产生的局部全身伽马射线剂量为0.004毫雷姆,即天然本底辐射年剂量的0.004%。

相似文献

1
Radioactive plume from the Three Mile Island accident: xenon-133 in air at a distance of 375 kilometers.三里岛事故的放射性烟羽:距离事故地点375公里处空气中的氙-133
Science. 1980 Feb 8;207(4431):639-40. doi: 10.1126/science.7352276.
2
A method for calculating doses to the population from 133Xe releases during the Three Mile Island accident.一种计算三里岛事故期间因释放¹³³Xe而导致人群所受剂量的方法。
Health Phys. 1981 Apr;40(4):457-65. doi: 10.1097/00004032-198104000-00003.
3
Evaluation of the response to xenon-133 radiations by thermoluminescent dosimeters used during the accident at Three Mile Island.三里岛事故期间使用的热释光剂量计对氙 - 133辐射响应的评估。
Health Phys. 1982 Mar;42(3):329-34. doi: 10.1097/00004032-198203000-00006.
4
Doses received while crossing a plume of radioactive material released during an accident at a nuclear power plant.在核电站事故期间穿过释放出的放射性物质烟羽时所接受的剂量。
Health Phys. 1982 Aug;43(2):187-203. doi: 10.1097/00004032-198208000-00001.
5
Spectral composition of the gamma-ray exposure rate due to noble gases released during a reactor accident.反应堆事故期间释放的惰性气体导致的伽马射线照射率的能谱组成。
Health Phys. 1982 Sep;43(3):335-43. doi: 10.1097/00004032-198209000-00003.
6
[Actual measurements following the Chernobyl reactor accident].
Acta Med Austriaca. 1986;13(4-5):107-13.
7
Fallout at Three Mile Island.三里岛核事故
Ann Intern Med. 1979 Sep;91(3):486-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-91-3-486.
8
Xenon-133: ambient activity from nuclear power stations.
Science. 1976 Jun 18;192(4245):1235-7. doi: 10.1126/science.192.4245.1235.
9
[Radioecologic knowledge from the Chernobyl reactor accident].
Strahlenschutz Forsch Prax. 1987;29:39-50.
10
Risks of local and global public health effects from the purge of krypton-85 at Three Mile Island in 1980.1980年三哩岛清除氪-85对当地和全球公共卫生造成影响的风险。
Health Phys. 1982 Oct;43(4):598-601.

引用本文的文献

1
Radiobiological shot noise explains Three Mile Island biodosimetry indicating nearly 1,000 mSv exposures.放射生物学散粒噪声解释了三哩岛生物剂量学,表明了近 1000 毫西弗的照射。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 2;10(1):10933. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67826-5.
2
The association between socioeconomic status and reactions to radiation exposure: a cross-sectional study after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station accident.社会经济地位与辐射暴露反应之间的关联:福岛第一核电站事故后的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 31;13(10):e0205531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205531. eCollection 2018.
3
Objectivity and ethics in environmental health science.
环境卫生科学中的客观性与伦理道德
Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Nov;111(14):1809-18. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6200.
4
A reevaluation of cancer incidence near the Three Mile Island nuclear plant: the collision of evidence and assumptions.三里岛核电站附近癌症发病率的重新评估:证据与假设的碰撞
Environ Health Perspect. 1997 Jan;105(1):52-7. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9710552.