Ozols R F, Garvin A J, Costa J, Simon R M, Young R C
Cancer. 1980 Feb;45(3):572-81. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19800201)45:3<572::aid-cncr2820450325>3.0.co;2-3.
In order to determine the prognostic and therapeutic importance of histologic grade for patients with advanced ovarian cancer, the pathologic specimens from 82 patients with Stage III-IV disease (as defined by the International Federation of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (F.I.G.O.)) were reviewed and graded by two methods. A system based on cytologic detail using both the degree of anaplasia and the number of undifferentiated cells, (modified Broders' Grades 1--4) was found to be particularly useful because it identified four groups with different survival outcomes as well as an apparent differential response to chemotherapy. Specifically, the overall improvement of survival in patients with Stage III-IV disease observed in a prospective study of combination chemotherapy was related primarily to an increased survival of patients with Grade 2 and 3 lesions. Survival in Grade 1 patients was markedly better than for Grade 4 patients, but in neither case did survival appear to be influenced by the choice of chemotherapy. These observations suggest that prospective clinical trials assessing the efficacy of chemotherapy should employ cytologic grades as a separate stratification factor since chemotherapy for advanced disease may have to be tailored, in part, to the histologic grade.
为了确定组织学分级对晚期卵巢癌患者预后及治疗的重要性,我们采用两种方法对82例国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)定义的Ⅲ - Ⅳ期疾病患者的病理标本进行了回顾和分级。一种基于细胞学细节的系统,同时考虑间变程度和未分化细胞数量(改良的布罗德斯分级1 - 4级),被发现特别有用,因为它识别出了四组具有不同生存结果以及对化疗有明显不同反应的患者。具体而言,在一项联合化疗前瞻性研究中观察到的Ⅲ - Ⅳ期疾病患者总体生存率的提高,主要与2级和3级病变患者生存率的提高有关。1级患者的生存率明显优于4级患者,但在这两种情况下,生存率似乎都不受化疗选择的影响。这些观察结果表明,评估化疗疗效的前瞻性临床试验应将细胞学分级作为一个单独的分层因素,因为晚期疾病的化疗可能部分需要根据组织学分级进行调整。