King C E, Toskes P P, Guilarte T R, Lorenz E, Welkos S L
Dig Dis Sci. 1980 Jan;25(1):53-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01312733.
In twelve patients with culture-proven bacterial overgrowth of the small intestine, the ability of a newly-developed one-gram d-[14C]xylose breath test to detect bacterial overgrowth was compared to that of the [14C]bile acid breath test. All patients manifested excessive production of breath 14CO2 after the administration of one gram [14C]xylose, with 83% of the patients being abnormal within the first hour of testing. In contrast, during the [14C]bile acid breath test, four of the twelve patients had no period of excessive 14CO2 production (above the 95% confidence range of controls). Nutrient malabsorption (fat, cobalamin, xylose) was seen with both true-positive and false-negative bile acid breath tests. The one gram [14C]xylose breath test, utilizing a substrate with more predominant absorption in the proximal small intestine and which can be catabolized by Gram-negative aerobic bacteria, appears to have a greater degree of sensitivity and specificity than the bile acid breath test in detecting the presence of small-intestine bacterial overgrowth.
在12例经培养证实存在小肠细菌过度生长的患者中,将新开发的1克d-[14C]木糖呼气试验检测细菌过度生长的能力与[14C]胆汁酸呼气试验进行了比较。所有患者在服用1克[14C]木糖后均表现出呼气中14CO2产生过多,83%的患者在检测的第一小时内结果异常。相比之下,在[14C]胆汁酸呼气试验期间,12例患者中有4例没有14CO2产生过多的时期(高于对照组的95%置信范围)。在胆汁酸呼气试验的真阳性和假阴性结果中均可见营养物质吸收不良(脂肪、钴胺素、木糖)。1克[14C]木糖呼气试验使用在近端小肠吸收更占优势且可被革兰氏阴性需氧菌分解代谢的底物,在检测小肠细菌过度生长的存在方面似乎比胆汁酸呼气试验具有更高的灵敏度和特异性。