Grundner T M
N Engl J Med. 1980 Apr 17;302(16):900-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198004173021606.
A great deal of attention has been paid to ensuring that surgical consent forms have valid content, but little effort has been made to ensure that the average patient can read and understand them. Five representative surgical consent forms were analyzed with two standardized readability tests. The readability of all five was approximately equivalent to that of material intended for upper-division undergraduates or graduate students. Four of the five forms were written at the level of a scientific journal, and the fifth at the level of a specialized academic magazine. I suggest that few consent forms currently in use could pass readability tests. The implication of these findings is that thousands of persons may be undergoing surgery each year on the basis of inadequate consent. The problem has a reasonably simple solution: analysis of all consent forms for readability, and rewriting of those found excessively difficult.
人们已经非常关注确保手术同意书内容有效,但在确保普通患者能够阅读和理解这些同意书方面却几乎没有付出努力。使用两种标准化可读性测试方法对五份具有代表性的手术同意书进行了分析。所有这五份同意书的可读性大致相当于供本科高年级学生或研究生阅读的材料。其中四份同意书的写作水平相当于科学期刊,第五份相当于专业学术杂志。我认为目前使用的同意书中很少有能通过可读性测试的。这些发现意味着每年可能有成千上万的人在同意书不充分的情况下接受手术。这个问题有一个相当简单的解决办法:分析所有同意书的可读性,并改写那些发现过于难懂的同意书。