• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大学资助研究中的同意书可读性。

Consent form readability in university-sponsored research.

作者信息

Goldstein A O, Frasier P, Curtis P, Reid A, Kreher N E

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina, Institute for the Generalist Physician, Chapel Hill, USA.

出版信息

J Fam Pract. 1996 Jun;42(6):606-11.

PMID:8656172
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Consent forms are required in most biomedical research involving human subjects. In recent years, a number of studies from different disciplines have reported problems related to consent form readability.

METHODS

We analyzed 284 consent forms submitted to and approved by five institutional review boards (IRBs) (schools of Medicine, Nursing, Academic Affairs, Dentistry, and Public Health) at one university and one IRB at another. We examined consent form readability scores and factors that might relate to readability.

RESULTS

The average reading level of all consent forms was high: 12.2, which corresponds roughly to a 12th-grade reading level. Less than 10% of all consent forms were written at a 10th grade reading level or below. Thirty-two percent of all consent forms had no evidence of revisions, and less than 2% of consent forms were revised more than once. Readability scores were not related to consent form revisions, the type of IRB, the year of study, or the university where the research was conducted.

CONCLUSIONS

Poor readability of consent forms probably occurs in all university-related research. We recommend that IRBs require readability checks for research consent forms before researchers submit their proposals to an IRB.

摘要

背景

在大多数涉及人类受试者的生物医学研究中都需要使用知情同意书。近年来,来自不同学科的多项研究报告了与知情同意书可读性相关的问题。

方法

我们分析了提交给一所大学的五个机构审查委员会(医学院、护理学院、学术事务部、牙科学院和公共卫生学院)以及另一所大学的一个机构审查委员会并获得批准的284份知情同意书。我们检查了知情同意书的可读性得分以及可能与可读性相关的因素。

结果

所有知情同意书的平均阅读水平较高:为12.2,大致相当于十二年级的阅读水平。所有知情同意书中不到10%是按照十年级或更低的阅读水平撰写的。所有知情同意书中32%没有修订的迹象,不到2%的知情同意书被修订过不止一次。可读性得分与知情同意书的修订、机构审查委员会的类型、研究年份或开展研究的大学无关。

结论

知情同意书可读性差的情况可能在所有与大学相关的研究中都会出现。我们建议机构审查委员会在研究人员向其提交研究方案之前,要求对研究知情同意书进行可读性检查。

相似文献

1
Consent form readability in university-sponsored research.大学资助研究中的同意书可读性。
J Fam Pract. 1996 Jun;42(6):606-11.
2
Informed consent for research: a study to evaluate readability and processability to effect change.研究知情同意书:一项评估可读性及实现改变的可操作性的研究。
J Investig Med. 1995 Oct;43(5):459-67.
3
Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability.知情同意书的可读性标准与实际可读性对比
N Engl J Med. 2003 Feb 20;348(8):721-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa021212.
4
Are research participants truly informed? Readability of informed consent forms used in research.研究参与者是否真的得到了充分告知?研究中使用的知情同意书的可读性。
Ethics Behav. 1991;1(4):239-52. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0104_2.
5
Readability of pediatric biomedical research informed consent forms.儿科生物医学研究知情同意书的可读性。
Pediatrics. 1990 Jan;85(1):58-62.
6
Consent forms: how to determine and improve their readability.同意书:如何确定并提高其可读性。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1992 Nov-Dec;19(10):1523-8.
7
Effectiveness of a writing improvement intervention program on the readability of the research informed consent document.一项写作改进干预计划对研究知情同意书可读性的有效性。
J Investig Med. 1999 Nov;47(9):468-76.
8
Readability of informed consent forms.知情同意书的可读性。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1991 Dec;48(12):2651-2.
9
Minimal-risk waiver of informed consent and exception from informed consent (Final Rule) studies at institutional review boards nationwide.全国各机构审查委员会对知情同意的最小风险豁免和知情同意例外情况(最终规则)研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;12(11):1134-7. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.011.
10
Informed consent for research on stored blood and tissue samples: a survey of institutional review board practices.关于储存血液和组织样本研究的知情同意:机构审查委员会实践调查
Account Res. 2002 Jan-Mar;9(1):1-16. doi: 10.1080/08989620210354.

引用本文的文献

1
Sense and readability: participant information sheets for research studies.意义与可读性:研究项目的参与者信息表
Br J Psychiatry. 2016 Feb;208(2):189-94. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.156687. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
2
Comprehensibility of translated informed consent documents used in clinical research in psychiatry.精神病学临床研究中使用的翻译后的知情同意书的可理解性。
Indian J Psychol Med. 2010 Jan;32(1):7-12. doi: 10.4103/0253-7176.70517.
3
[Measurement of the legibility of written texts. Correlation between the Flesch manual method and computer methods].
[书写文本易读性的测量。弗莱什人工方法与计算机方法之间的相关性]
Aten Primaria. 2003 Feb 15;31(2):104-8. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(03)79146-x.