Spitzer W O, Dickie G L, Bass M J, Roberts R, Demanuele F, Stockwell H, Feightner J, Moore C, Williams J I, Skene S
Can Med Assoc J. 1980 Feb 23;122(4):429-32.
The Core Content Review of Family Medicine was assessed for its relevance to family practice. Three sets of questionnaires were completed and assessed by 48 experienced, certificated family physicians, of whom half were faculty members from university departments of family medicine and half were in private practice. The answers to 57% of the questions were correct. In the opinion of the panelists the answers to 62% of the questions permitted discrimination between physicians providing care of good quality and those providing care that was less than adequate. The panelists rated 78% of the questions as being educationally useful. Two thirds of the questions were deemed relevant according to a composite criterion. Examples are given of the questions considered most relevant and of those considered least relevant.
对《家庭医学核心内容综述》与家庭医疗实践的相关性进行了评估。48位经验丰富、获得认证的家庭医生完成并评估了三套问卷，其中一半是来自大学家庭医学系的教员，另一半是私人执业医生。57%的问题回答正确。在小组成员看来，62%的问题答案能够区分提供高质量医疗服务的医生和提供医疗服务质量欠佳的医生。小组成员将78%的问题评为具有教育意义。根据综合标准，三分之二的问题被认为是相关的。给出了被认为最相关和最不相关问题的示例。
