• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Bacterial abundance on hands and its implications for clinical trials of surgical scrubs.手部细菌数量及其对外科洗手临床试验的影响。
J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Apr;11(4):389-93. doi: 10.1128/jcm.11.4.389-393.1980.
2
Surgical hand antisepsis to reduce surgical site infection.外科手消毒以减少手术部位感染。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23(1):CD004288. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004288.pub2.
3
Population kinetics of the skin flora on gloved hands following surgical hand disinfection with 3 propanol-based hand rubs: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial.使用三种基于丙醇的手消毒剂进行外科手消毒后戴手套手上皮肤菌群的群体动力学:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲试验。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007 Mar;28(3):346-50. doi: 10.1086/510865. Epub 2007 Feb 15.
4
A randomized trial of surgical scrubbing with a brush compared to antiseptic soap alone.一项比较使用刷子进行外科洗手与单独使用抗菌肥皂的随机试验。
Am J Infect Control. 1997 Feb;25(1):11-5. doi: 10.1016/s0196-6553(97)90047-x.
5
Exploring bacterial growth and recolonization after preoperative hand disinfection and surgery between operating room nurses and non-health care workers: a pilot study.术前手部消毒和手术期间手术室护士与非卫生保健工作者之间的细菌生长和再定植情况的探索性研究:一项初步研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Sep 17;18(1):466. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3375-3.
6
Effects of a protective foam on scrubbing and gloving.一种防护泡沫对刷洗和戴手套的影响。
Am J Infect Control. 1993 Dec;21(6):297-301. doi: 10.1016/0196-6553(93)90386-i.
7
Effectiveness of liquid soap vs. chlorhexidine gluconate for the removal of Clostridium difficile from bare hands and gloved hands.液体肥皂与葡萄糖酸洗必泰用于去除裸手和戴手套手上艰难梭菌的效果比较
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1994 Nov;15(11):697-702. doi: 10.1086/646840.
8
Effect of surgical hand scrub time on subsequent bacterial growth.
AORN J. 1997 Jun;65(6):1087-92; 1094-8. doi: 10.1016/s0001-2092(06)62949-9.
9
An evaluation of five protocols for surgical handwashing in relation to skin condition and microbial counts.关于皮肤状况和微生物计数对五种外科洗手方案的评估。
J Hosp Infect. 1997 May;36(1):49-65. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(97)90090-6.
10
Preoperative Hand Decontamination in Ophthalmic Surgery: A Comparison of the Removal of Bacteria from Surgeons' Hands by Routine Antimicrobial Scrub versus an Alcoholic Hand Rub.眼科手术中的术前手部消毒:常规抗菌擦洗与酒精擦手对手术医生手部细菌清除效果的比较
Curr Eye Res. 2017 Sep;42(9):1333-1337. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2017.1304559. Epub 2017 May 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Myths and legends in orthopaedic practice: are we all guilty?骨科实践中的神话与传说:我们都有罪吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Nov;466(11):2861-72. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0458-2. Epub 2008 Aug 26.
2
Standardized method for evaluation of hand disinfection by surgical scrub formulations.手术刷洗制剂手部消毒评估的标准化方法。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989 Nov;55(11):2944-8. doi: 10.1128/aem.55.11.2944-2948.1989.

本文引用的文献

1
Safety and efficacy of the antiseptic chlorhexidine gluconate.葡萄糖酸氯己定防腐剂的安全性和有效性。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1976 Nov;143(5):789-92.

手部细菌数量及其对外科洗手临床试验的影响。

Bacterial abundance on hands and its implications for clinical trials of surgical scrubs.

作者信息

Spradlin C T

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Apr;11(4):389-93. doi: 10.1128/jcm.11.4.389-393.1980.

DOI:10.1128/jcm.11.4.389-393.1980
PMID:7372802
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC273410/
Abstract

The numbers of bacteria on the hands of 157 subjects volunteering for a clinical trial of a surgical scrub preparation were evaluated statistically. Differences among the volunteers with respect to day-to-day variability in bacterial counts were the most important source of variation in these counts. Generally, more bacteria were found on the left hand than on the right. The experimental plan, proposed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, contained criteria for acceptability of subjects which were found to exclude at least as many suitable volunteers as they admitted. The plan was also found to require more testing on more volunteers than was necessary to establish the efficacy of the surgical scrub.

摘要

对157名自愿参加一种手术擦洗制剂临床试验的受试者手上的细菌数量进行了统计学评估。志愿者之间手部细菌数量的日常变异性差异是这些细菌数量变化的最重要来源。一般来说,左手发现的细菌比右手多。美国食品药品监督管理局提出的实验方案包含了受试者可接受性标准,结果发现该标准排除的合适志愿者数量至少与入选的一样多。还发现该方案要求对更多志愿者进行更多测试,而这对于确定手术擦洗的疗效来说并非必要。