Jones E E
J Clin Psychol. 1980 Apr;36(2):544-7. doi: 10.1002/jclp.6120360227.
Assessed psychotherapy outcome for 177 patients who were seen for an average of 31 therapy hours with the Rating Scales for Outcome of Therapy and a Therapist Questionnaire. Results of a components analysis did not support Storrow's rational groupings of the Rating Scales into five dimensions and suggested that two general areas of psychological adjustment underlie the 11 scales. A second components analysis that included both outcome measures supports only in part the contention that when results from diverse outcome measures are factor analyzed, the factors necessarily are associated with method of measurement rather than substantive dimensions of change.
使用治疗结果评定量表和一份治疗师问卷，对177名平均接受了31个治疗小时的患者的心理治疗结果进行了评估。成分分析的结果并不支持斯托罗将评定量表合理地分为五个维度的观点，并表明心理调整的两个总体领域是这11个量表的基础。第二项包括两种结果测量方法的成分分析仅部分支持了这样一种观点，即当对来自不同结果测量方法的结果进行因素分析时，这些因素必然与测量方法相关，而非与变化的实质维度相关。
