Westermeyer J, Kroll J
Br J Psychiatry. 1978 Dec;133:529-41. doi: 10.1192/bjp.133.6.529.
Thirty-five people labelled as baa (crazy or insane) were studied in Laos--a country without psychiatrists or psychiatric institutions. Informant information was obtained for violence prior to becoming baa, violence during the course of their baa condition, and violence during the seven days prior to interview. Observation for violence was made for a one day period at the time of the interview. Use of restraints was also assessed. Subjects were significantly more apt to have assaulted others, posed a risk to themselves, and been restrained (although not incarcerated) during their baa condition as compared to their previous state. Those in early stages of their condition (two years or less) manifested more violence than those later in their condition. 'Folk' use of restraints was applied only after dangerous or violent behaviour had occurred. Restraints were released as soon as practicable, but there was an 'ascending' use of certain restraint measures if violence persisted.
在老挝这个没有精神科医生或精神病院的国家,对35名被标记为“baa”(疯狂或精神错乱)的人进行了研究。获取了关于他们在变成“baa”之前的暴力行为、处于“baa”状态期间的暴力行为以及访谈前七天内的暴力行为的 informant 信息。在访谈时对暴力行为进行了为期一天的观察。还评估了约束措施的使用情况。与他们之前的状态相比,受试者在处于“baa”状态时更有可能攻击他人、对自己构成风险并受到约束(尽管未被监禁)。处于病情早期(两年或更短时间)的人比病情后期的人表现出更多的暴力行为。“民间”约束措施仅在危险或暴力行为发生后才使用。约束措施会尽快解除,但如果暴力行为持续,某些约束措施的使用会“升级”。