Westermeyer J
Am J Psychiatry. 1980 Nov;137(11):1390-4. doi: 10.1176/ajp.137.11.1390.
Several clinicians have theorized that somatic and residential treatments have an untoward effect on the eventual outcome of major mental illness. To test this hypothesis, the author studied social coping behavior of mentally ill people in Laos, a predominantly peasant society with no psychiatrists or psychiatric hospitals. The Lao folk term baa ("crazy" or insane) was used in determining cases. Social factors studied included legal problems, family contact, sociability, friendship, communal activities, sexuality, and work. Results indicated that levels of social function in this sample were quite limited. The author concludes that social disability associated with chronic psychosis cannot be ascribed totally to diagnostic labeling or institutionalization.
几位临床医生推测,躯体治疗和住院治疗对重度精神疾病的最终预后有不良影响。为了验证这一假设,作者研究了老挝精神病患者的社会应对行为,老挝是一个以农民为主的社会,没有精神科医生或精神病院。通过老挝民间术语“baa”(“疯狂”或精神错乱)来确定病例。所研究的社会因素包括法律问题、家庭联系、社交性、友谊、社区活动、性行为和工作。结果表明,该样本中的社会功能水平相当有限。作者得出结论,与慢性精神病相关的社会残疾不能完全归因于诊断标签或机构化。