Suppr超能文献

自动白细胞分类计数器:Hemalog D的评估及与Hematrak的比较。II. 对医院患者常规血样的性能评估。

Automated differential leucocyte counters: an evaluation of the Hemalog D and A comparison with the Hematrak. II. Evaluation of performance on routine blood samples from hospital patients.

作者信息

Bain B J, Scott D, Scott T J

出版信息

Pathology. 1980 Jan;12(1):101-9. doi: 10.3109/00313028009060058.

Abstract

The performance of the Hemalog D on routine blood samples from patients was assessed over a 6 wk period, 500 samples being studied in detail. The performance of the Hematrak was assessed on 85 routine blood samples. It was found that in our hospital population at least 58% of blood samples counted by the Hemalog D would require a blood film to be examined. Occasional patients with haematological diseases had abnormalities on the blood film but had normal Hemalog 8 and Hemalog D printouts. The Hemalog D was unable to perform an accurate differential count on the blood from a large proportion of patients with uraemia, including dialysis patients. The Hematrak was imprecise because of the small number of cells counted; it was also found to be inaccurate if blood films were not made rapidly after the blood was taken.

摘要

在6周的时间里,对Hemalog D在患者常规血样上的性能进行了评估,详细研究了500份样本。对Hematrak在85份常规血样上的性能进行了评估。结果发现,在我们医院的患者群体中,至少58%经Hemalog D计数的血样需要检查血涂片。偶尔有血液系统疾病的患者血涂片有异常,但Hemalog 8和Hemalog D打印结果正常。Hemalog D无法对包括透析患者在内的大部分尿毒症患者的血液进行准确的分类计数。由于计数的细胞数量少,Hematrak不精确;还发现如果采血后不迅速制作血涂片,其结果不准确。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验