Wilgus H S
Poult Sci. 1980 Apr;59(4):771-81.
Practical implications of interactions between disease and vitamins in poultry were sought in the readily available literature. The evidence, almost exclusively in chickens, is in accord with that reported in other animals and man,namely 1) dietary vitamin deficiencies can impair body defense mechanisms against disease and 2) occurrence of disease can increase vitamin requirements. Information on viral infections is inadequate and conflicting. Slight indications exist for positive interactions with ascorbic acid and for antagonistic ones with vitamin A. Studies on bacterial diseases involved 7 organisms, 11 vitamins, and 29 observations of which 25 (86%) indicated positive interactions. Those on parasitic infestations involved 9 organisms, 9 vitamins, and 55 observations of which 34 (82%) indicated interactions. The major evidence for interaction between individual vitamins and disease categories was for vitamin A and ascorbic acid in bacterial infections and for vitamins A and K in parasitic infestations. The numbers of confirming studies on individual diseases and vitamins deemed to be reasonably adequate to demonstrate specific interactions were limited to vitamin A in coccidiosis, in ascariasis, and probably in infectious coryza and of vitamin K in coccidiosis. Despite the paucity of specific and quantitative evidence, it appears likely that vitamin levels in chick rations containing generous margins of safety, as referred, should be adequate to meet the increased requirement caused by most diseases. However, when liver reserves of vitamin A are depleted, notably by severe coccidiosis, the effects may be ameliorated and recovery may be aided by additional vitamin A and possibly other fat-soluble vitamins. Decision for such augmentation, selection of formulation, and mode and duration of administration require collaboration of the pathologist and nutritionist familiar with the particular circumstances. It has not been proven that vitamins exert a pharmacodynamic effect or that they will replace the use of appropriate prophylactic or therapeutic drugs. Multidisciplinary research on specific nutrient requirements as affected by specific disease entities is sorely needed.
我们从现有的文献中探寻家禽疾病与维生素之间相互作用的实际意义。这些证据几乎全部来自鸡的研究,与其他动物及人类的研究结果一致,即:1)日粮中维生素缺乏会损害机体对疾病的防御机制;2)疾病的发生会增加维生素需求。关于病毒感染的信息不足且相互矛盾。有少量迹象表明维生素C与之存在正向相互作用,而与维生素A存在拮抗作用。关于细菌疾病的研究涉及7种病原体、11种维生素以及29项观察结果,其中25项(86%)表明存在正向相互作用。关于寄生虫感染的研究涉及9种病原体、9种维生素以及55项观察结果,其中34项(82%)表明存在相互作用。个体维生素与疾病类别之间相互作用的主要证据是,在细菌感染中维生素A和维生素C存在相互作用,在寄生虫感染中维生素A和维生素K存在相互作用。关于个体疾病和维生素的确认研究数量,被认为足以证明特定相互作用的,仅限于球虫病、蛔虫病以及可能的传染性鼻炎中的维生素A,以及球虫病中的维生素K。尽管缺乏具体和定量的证据,但似乎含有充足安全余量的雏鸡日粮中的维生素水平,应该足以满足大多数疾病导致的需求增加。然而,当维生素A的肝脏储备耗尽时,尤其是严重球虫病导致时,额外补充维生素A以及可能的其他脂溶性维生素,可能会改善这种情况并有助于恢复。这种补充的决策、制剂的选择以及给药方式和持续时间,需要熟悉具体情况的病理学家和营养学家共同协作。尚未证实维生素具有药效学作用,也未证实它们能替代适当的预防或治疗药物。迫切需要针对特定疾病实体影响下的特定营养需求进行多学科研究。