• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大鼠体内鹅去氧胆酸(CDCA)和去氢胆酸(DHCA)的利胆特性(作者译)

[Choleretica properties of chenodeoxycholic acid CDCA and dehydrocholic acid (DHCA) in rats (author's transl)].

作者信息

Ishikawa S, Iizuka A, Yanaura S

出版信息

Nihon Yakurigaku Zasshi. 1980 Jan;76(1):25-32.

PMID:7380360
Abstract

Mechanisms of hepatic bile secretion were studied in unanesthetized bile fistula rats. After implantation of bile fistula, bile flow and bile acids secretion were significantly decreased and secondary bile acids were greatly decreased. After cholic acid (CA) 30 microM/100 g/hr infusion, bile juice was greatly increased, and CA was dramatically increased in bile. Biliary bile flow and bile acid were not increased after infusion of CDCA 30 microM/100 g/hr. CDCA was slightly increased in bile, but the amount of bile acids tended to decrease. DHCA dramatically increased the amount of bile juice, while DHCA was not detected in the bile. After DHCA infusion, 3 alpha, 7 alpha-dihydroxy-12-keto-5 beta-cholanic acid dramatically increased and slightly increased in CA. Regarding the relationship between the bile flow rate and the secretion rate of the total bile acids, bile acid-dependent bile secretion varied with the bile acid value. On the other hand, Na+ and K+ concentrations of bile were not related to bile acid concentration. These studies show that canalicular bile secretion mechanisms varied with the compositions of bile acids and bile acid secretion rate.

摘要

在未麻醉的胆瘘大鼠中研究了肝脏胆汁分泌的机制。植入胆瘘后,胆汁流量和胆汁酸分泌显著减少,次级胆汁酸大幅减少。以30微摩尔/100克/小时的速度输注胆酸(CA)后,胆汁量大幅增加,胆汁中的CA显著增加。以30微摩尔/100克/小时的速度输注鹅去氧胆酸(CDCA)后,胆汁流量和胆汁酸并未增加。胆汁中的CDCA略有增加,但胆汁酸的量趋于减少。二氢胆酸(DHCA)显著增加了胆汁量,而胆汁中未检测到DHCA。输注DHCA后,3α,7α-二羟基-12-酮-5β-胆烷酸显著增加,CA略有增加。关于胆汁流速与总胆汁酸分泌率之间的关系,胆汁酸依赖性胆汁分泌随胆汁酸值而变化。另一方面,胆汁中的Na+和K+浓度与胆汁酸浓度无关。这些研究表明,胆小管胆汁分泌机制随胆汁酸组成和胆汁酸分泌率而变化。

相似文献

1
[Choleretica properties of chenodeoxycholic acid CDCA and dehydrocholic acid (DHCA) in rats (author's transl)].大鼠体内鹅去氧胆酸(CDCA)和去氢胆酸(DHCA)的利胆特性(作者译)
Nihon Yakurigaku Zasshi. 1980 Jan;76(1):25-32.
2
Influence of dehydrocholic acid on the secretion of bile acids and biliary lipids in rats.脱氢胆酸对大鼠胆汁酸和胆汁脂质分泌的影响。
Digestion. 1990;45(1):40-51. doi: 10.1159/000200223.
3
Choleretic properties of ursodeoxycholic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid in dogs.熊去氧胆酸和鹅去氧胆酸对犬的利胆特性
Jpn J Pharmacol. 1978 Jun;28(3):383-9. doi: 10.1254/jjp.28.383.
4
[Effect of ursodeoxycholic acid on bile secretion and bile components. Comparison with chenodeoxycholic acid and dehydrocholic acid].[熊去氧胆酸对胆汁分泌及胆汁成分的影响。与鹅去氧胆酸和去氢胆酸的比较]
Nihon Yakurigaku Zasshi. 1976 Sep;72(6):689-700.
5
Effect of dehydrocholic, chenodeoxycholic, and taurocholic acids on the excretion of bilirubin.脱氢胆酸、鹅去氧胆酸和牛磺胆酸对胆红素排泄的影响。
Am J Vet Res. 1980 Mar;41(3):355-61.
6
Choleric potencies of some bile acids and their effect on biliary excretion of eosin in the rat.某些胆汁酸的胆汁酸盐效力及其对大鼠胆汁中嗜酸性粒细胞排泄的影响。
Acta Biol Med Ger. 1980;39(6):711-5.
7
Studies on the origin of biliary phospholipid. Effect of dehydrocholic acid and cholic acid infusions on hepatic and biliary phospholipids.胆汁磷脂起源的研究。脱氢胆酸和胆酸输注对肝脏和胆汁磷脂的影响。
Biochem J. 1990 Sep 15;270(3):691-5. doi: 10.1042/bj2700691.
8
Effects of feeding cholic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid on cholesterol absorption and hepatic secretion of biliary lipids in man.喂食胆酸和鹅去氧胆酸对人体胆固醇吸收及胆汁脂质肝分泌的影响。
J Lipid Res. 1980 Jan;21(1):23-34.
9
The effect of drugs on bile flow and composition. An overview.药物对胆汁流量和成分的影响。综述
Drugs. 1986 May;31(5):430-48. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198631050-00003.
10
Studies on bile secretion in man. 3. Influence of sodium dehydrocholate, a diuretic and glucagon on bile secretion.人体胆汁分泌的研究。3. 去氢胆酸钠、一种利尿剂和胰高血糖素对胆汁分泌的影响。
Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 1974;22(2):207-35.