Kuksis A, Myher J J, Geher K, Shaikh N A, Breckenridge W C, Jones G J, Little J A
J Chromatogr. 1980 Apr 11;182(1):1-26. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4347(00)81646-1.
Plasma samples obtained during a prevalence study of hyperlipemia in a free-living urban population were analyzed for phosphatidylcholine, sphingomyelin and lysophosphatidylcholine content by automated high-temperature gas--liquid chromatographic (GLC) and manual colorimetric phosphorus (thin-layer chromatographic, TLC) methods. The GLC estimates were obtained from a quantitative analysis of the diacylglycerol, ceramide and monoacylglycerol moieties released from the parent phospholipids by digestion with phospholipase C, while the TLC estimates were derived by manual colorimetric phosphorus analyses of the individual phospholipid classes resolved by TLC. On samples analyzed over a two-year period the methods gave excellent correlation for the total phospholipids (r = 0.98), phosphatidylcholine (r = 0.98) and sphingomyelin (r = 0.90), but resulted in a poor agreement for lysophosphatidylcholine (r = 0.69). Comparable results were obtained for estimates of these phospholipids in plasma very low density, low density and high density lipoproteins. The between-method coefficient of variation ranged from 3 to 5% for phosphatidylcholine and from 5 to 10% for sphingomyelin. The relative error for the estimates of lysophosphatidylcholine ranged from 10 to 25%, and was due to the inclusion in the GLC estimates of a variable proportion of plasma free monoacylglycerols. Other differences between the two methods are due to various analytical errors and biases inherent in the two techniques. The within-day, within GLC, relative error averaged 1% for phosphatidylcholine, 3% for sphingomyelin and 5% for lysophosphatidylcholine. The apparent high precision and accuracy of the GLC method recommend it as an alternative to conventional direct methods of phospholipid analyses based on TLC isolation of lipid classes and colorimetric measurements of their phosphorus content. The GLC analyses of the plasma phospholipids are particularly convenient in conjunction with GLC measurements of plasma cholesterol and triacylglycerols, where a smaller throughput of samples is not a limitation and where both total amount and relative proportion of the lipids are of interest.
在一项针对自由生活的城市人群高脂血症患病率的研究中,采集了血浆样本,采用自动高温气液色谱法(GLC)和手动比色磷法(薄层色谱法,TLC)分析磷脂酰胆碱、鞘磷脂和溶血磷脂酰胆碱的含量。GLC估算值来自于用磷脂酶C消化母体磷脂后释放的二酰基甘油、神经酰胺和单酰基甘油部分的定量分析,而TLC估算值则通过对TLC分离出的各个磷脂类进行手动比色磷分析得出。在两年期间分析的样本上,两种方法对于总磷脂(r = 0.98)、磷脂酰胆碱(r = 0.98)和鞘磷脂(r = 0.90)的相关性良好,但对于溶血磷脂酰胆碱的一致性较差(r = 0.69)。对于血浆极低密度脂蛋白、低密度脂蛋白和高密度脂蛋白中这些磷脂的估算,也得到了类似的结果。磷脂酰胆碱的方法间变异系数在3%至5%之间,鞘磷脂的变异系数在5%至10%之间。溶血磷脂酰胆碱估算值的相对误差在10%至25%之间,这是由于GLC估算中包含了可变比例的血浆游离单酰基甘油。两种方法之间的其他差异是由于两种技术固有的各种分析误差和偏差。在GLC日内,磷脂酰胆碱的相对误差平均为1%,鞘磷脂为3%,溶血磷脂酰胆碱为5%。GLC方法明显的高精度和准确性推荐它作为基于脂质类TLC分离和磷含量比色测量的传统直接磷脂分析方法的替代方法。血浆磷脂的GLC分析与血浆胆固醇和三酰甘油的GLC测量相结合特别方便,在这种情况下,样本通量较小不是限制因素,并且脂质的总量和相对比例都很重要。