Ahren Y, Berk H J
Z Psychosom Med Psychoanal. 1980 Apr-Jun;26(2):168-77.
In 1960 Wolpe and Rachman published a critique of psychoanalytic evidence based on Freud's case of Little Hans. No one has yet attempted to contest their argument. In a review of this classic critique it is shown that Wolpe and Rachman misrepresent and misunderstand central points of Freud's study. The alternative view of Hans' phobia which Wolpe and Rachman put up was already considered by Freud himself and rejected for good reasons. Some fundamental assumptions of behavior therapy and psychoanalysis are contrasted. The authors point out that psychologists have to develop their own philosophy of science.
1960年,沃尔普和拉赫曼发表了一篇基于弗洛伊德的小汉斯案例对精神分析证据的批判。至今还没有人试图对他们的论点提出质疑。在对这一经典批判的回顾中可以看出,沃尔普和拉赫曼歪曲并误解了弗洛伊德研究的核心要点。沃尔普和拉赫曼提出的关于汉斯恐惧症的另一种观点,弗洛伊德自己已经考虑过,并因充分的理由而予以否定。行为疗法和精神分析的一些基本假设形成了对比。作者指出,心理学家必须发展自己的科学哲学。