Epler G R, Saber F A, Gaensler E A
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1980 Apr;121(4):647-59. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1980.121.4.647.
Physicians trained primarily to recognize and treat disease are being asked more frequently to quantify impairment of health. Criteria for defining impairment due to chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases are widely accepted, but it has been difficult to establish guidelines for interstitial diseases. To develop and validate criteria, we selected 2,420 patients with airflow obstruction; 821 had interstitial disease, and 938 were employees of asbestos industries. We found that clinical and roentgenographic criteria were inappropriate for defining impairment. The forced vital capacity and single-breath diffusing capacity, each expressed as a percentage of the predicted value, were selected for analysis. Sensitivity studies using response to standard exercise as an independent criterion suggested that the limits reflecting severe impairment were a forced vital capacity 50% of predicted and a single-breath diffusing capacity 40% of predicted. Applying these criteria, 35.6% of patients with interstitial pneumonia, 12.1% with sarcoidosis, and 13.6% with pneumoconioses, but only 1.1% of the workers exposed to asbestos were severely impaired. In more than one half of patients the single-breath diffusing capacity was the only test that indicated severe impairment.
主要接受疾病识别与治疗培训的医生,现在越来越频繁地被要求对健康损害进行量化评估。慢性阻塞性肺疾病所致损害的定义标准已被广泛接受,但针对间质性疾病制定指南却一直困难重重。为了制定并验证相关标准,我们选取了2420例气流受限患者,其中821例患有间质性疾病,938例是石棉行业的员工。我们发现临床和X线标准不适用于定义损害。选取用力肺活量和单次呼吸弥散量,并分别表示为预测值的百分比进行分析。以对标准运动的反应作为独立标准的敏感性研究表明,反映严重损害的界限为用力肺活量是预测值的50%,单次呼吸弥散量是预测值的40%。应用这些标准,间质性肺炎患者中有35.6%、结节病患者中有12.1%、尘肺病患者中有13.6%存在严重损害,但石棉暴露工人中只有1.1%严重受损。在超过一半的患者中,单次呼吸弥散量是唯一显示严重损害的检查。