• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用掩蔽级差识别有感知问题的儿童。

The use of masking level differences in the identification of children with perceptual problems.

作者信息

Sweetow R W, Reddell R C

出版信息

J Am Aud Soc. 1978 Sep-Oct;4(2):52-6.

PMID:738915
Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether masking level differences (MLD's) could differentiate between normal children and children with suspected auditory processing problems. MLD's for speech and 500-Hz tones were measured for an experimental group consisting of 24 normal-hearing children suspected of having auditory perceptual dysfunction. Fourteen children with normal auditory processing abilities and 11 normal-hearing adults comprised the control groups. Results indicated that (1) there was no difference between MLD's for "normal" children and normal adults; (2) there was no difference between speech MLD's for the two groups of children; however, (3) tonal MLD's for the children with suspected auditory perceptual problems were significantly lower than those for the normal groups. Using a cut-off tonal MLD of 7 dB, 79% of the experimental group were positively identified whereas only 12% of the normals were identified. The tonal MLD can be a strong addition to a central test battery, especially because it can be used with nonverbal children who cannot complete many tests because of limited linguistic skills.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定掩蔽级差(MLD)能否区分正常儿童和疑似有听觉处理问题的儿童。对由24名疑似有听觉感知功能障碍的听力正常儿童组成的实验组,测量了言语和500赫兹纯音的MLD。14名听觉处理能力正常的儿童和11名听力正常的成年人组成了对照组。结果表明:(1)“正常”儿童和正常成年人的MLD没有差异;(2)两组儿童的言语MLD没有差异;然而,(3)疑似有听觉感知问题的儿童的纯音MLD显著低于正常组。使用7分贝的纯音MLD截止值,实验组中79%被正确识别,而正常组中只有12%被识别。纯音MLD可以有力地补充中枢测试组,特别是因为它可以用于因语言技能有限而无法完成许多测试的非语言儿童。

相似文献

1
The use of masking level differences in the identification of children with perceptual problems.利用掩蔽级差识别有感知问题的儿童。
J Am Aud Soc. 1978 Sep-Oct;4(2):52-6.
2
Masking level difference among brazilian military personnel: a comparison between pilots and non-pilots.巴西军人之间的掩蔽水平差异:飞行员和非飞行员之间的比较。
Int J Audiol. 2021 Dec;60(12):1016-1022. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1909759. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
3
Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.噪声中的语音识别:估计基底膜反应中压缩非线性的影响。
Ear Hear. 2007 Sep;28(5):682-93. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31812f7156.
4
Attention, memory, and auditory processing in 10- to 15-year-old children with listening difficulties.10至15岁有听力困难儿童的注意力、记忆力及听觉处理能力
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Dec;57(6):2308-21. doi: 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-H-13-0226.
5
Two-tone auditory suppression in younger and older normal-hearing adults and its relationship to speech perception in noise.年轻和年长听力正常成年人的双音听觉抑制及其与噪声中言语感知的关系。
Hear Res. 2010 Jun 1;264(1-2):56-62. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.12.020. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
6
[The use of masking level differences in evaluating central auditory processing: the norms for the normal hearing subjects].[使用掩蔽级差评估中枢听觉处理:正常听力受试者的常模]
Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg. 2003 Mar;10(3):93-7.
7
Binaural masking release in children with Down syndrome.唐氏综合征患儿的双耳掩蔽解脱
Ear Hear. 2014 Jul-Aug;35(4):e134-42. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000026.
8
Effect of companding on speech recognition in quiet and noise for listeners with ANSD.扩张压缩对感音神经性聋患者在安静和噪声环境下言语识别的影响。
Int J Audiol. 2014 Feb;53(2):94-100. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.849008. Epub 2013 Nov 18.
9
Psychoacoustic tests for central auditory processing: normative data.中枢听觉处理的心理声学测试:常模数据。
J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 2008;19(3-4):249-59. doi: 10.1515/jbcpp.2008.19.3-4.249.
10
Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.语音识别对时间和频谱失真材料的影响:年龄和听力损失的作用。
Ear Hear. 2012 May-Jun;33(3):349-66. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318242571c.

引用本文的文献

1
A Study on the Reference Values and Cutoff Criteria of Masking Level Difference for Children Aged 7-12 Years.7至12岁儿童掩蔽级差参考值及截断标准的研究
J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 7;11(18):5282. doi: 10.3390/jcm11185282.
2
Masking Level Difference: test-retest reliability assessment in normal hearing female university students.掩蔽级差:正常听力女大学生的重测信度评估。
Codas. 2022 Jan 7;34(3):e20200207. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20212020207. eCollection 2022.
3
Cluster Analyses Reveals Subgroups of Children With Suspected Auditory Processing Disorders.
聚类分析揭示了疑似听觉处理障碍儿童的亚组。
Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 15;10:2481. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02481. eCollection 2019.