• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西军人之间的掩蔽水平差异:飞行员和非飞行员之间的比较。

Masking level difference among brazilian military personnel: a comparison between pilots and non-pilots.

机构信息

School of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, Santa Casa de Sao Paulo School of Medical Sciences, São Paulo, Brazil.

Brazilian Navy, Santa Casa de Sao Paulo School of Medical Sciences, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Int J Audiol. 2021 Dec;60(12):1016-1022. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1909759. Epub 2021 Apr 15.

DOI:10.1080/14992027.2021.1909759
PMID:33856947
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to investigate auditory habits and binaural interaction among pilot and non-pilot military personnel from the Brazilian Air Force.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study using (1) an auditory habits questionnaire to outline the groups auditory profile and (2) the masking level difference test (MLD, Auditec, Saint Louis®) to evaluate and compare the groups.

STUDY SAMPLE

Forty military male personnel aged between 30-40 years old, all with normal hearing, comprising 20 pilots in the study group (SG), and 20 non-pilots, not exposed to noise, in the control group (CG).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between groups regarding auditory habits. In the MLD test, a significantly better performance under the homophasic condition (S0N0) was found in the SG. Under the antiphasic condition (SπN0) there were no differences between groups. This combination resulted in a significantly lower MLD in the SG compared to the CG.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeated exposure to conditions where active pilots have to learn to recognise speech in noisy backgrounds may lead to a better performance in the MLD's homophasic condition (S0N0).

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查巴西空军飞行员和非飞行员军事人员的听觉习惯和双耳相互作用。

设计

使用(1)听觉习惯问卷来概述组的听觉特征,(2)掩蔽级差测试(MLD,Auditec,圣路易斯®)来评估和比较组。

研究样本

40 名年龄在 30-40 岁之间的男性军事人员,均具有正常听力,包括 20 名研究组飞行员(SG)和 20 名非飞行员,不受噪声暴露,在对照组(CG)。

结果

两组在听觉习惯方面无显著差异。在 MLD 测试中,SG 在同相条件(S0N0)下表现出明显更好的性能。在反相条件(SπN0)下,两组之间没有差异。与 CG 相比,SG 的 MLD 明显较低。

结论

反复暴露于飞行员必须学会在嘈杂背景中识别语音的条件下,可能导致 MLD 的同相条件(S0N0)表现更好。

相似文献

1
Masking level difference among brazilian military personnel: a comparison between pilots and non-pilots.巴西军人之间的掩蔽水平差异:飞行员和非飞行员之间的比较。
Int J Audiol. 2021 Dec;60(12):1016-1022. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1909759. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
2
The use of masking level differences in the identification of children with perceptual problems.利用掩蔽级差识别有感知问题的儿童。
J Am Aud Soc. 1978 Sep-Oct;4(2):52-6.
3
Masking Level Difference: test-retest reliability assessment in normal hearing female university students.掩蔽级差:正常听力女大学生的重测信度评估。
Codas. 2022 Jan 7;34(3):e20200207. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20212020207. eCollection 2022.
4
The masking level difference in chinchilla auditory cortex. Effects of inner hair cell loss.灰鼠听觉皮层的掩蔽级差。内毛细胞缺失的影响。
Hear Res. 2003 Apr;178(1-2):12-26. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5955(03)00023-6.
5
The binaural masking-level difference of mandarin tone detection and the binaural intelligibility-level difference of mandarin tone recognition in the presence of speech-spectrum noise.在存在语音频谱噪声的情况下,普通话声调检测的双耳掩蔽级差及普通话声调识别的双耳可懂度级差。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 2;10(3):e0120977. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120977. eCollection 2015.
6
Binaural masking release in children with Down syndrome.唐氏综合征患儿的双耳掩蔽解脱
Ear Hear. 2014 Jul-Aug;35(4):e134-42. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000026.
7
Hearing threshold shifts among military pilots of the Israeli Air Force.以色列空军军事飞行员的听力阈值变化。
J R Army Med Corps. 2018 Feb;164(1):46-51. doi: 10.1136/jramc-2016-000758. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
8
Masking-level difference in filtered-random and amplitude-modulated noise.滤波随机噪声和调幅噪声中的掩蔽级差异。
J Speech Hear Res. 1984 Jun;27(2):267-74. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2702.267.
9
Development and evaluation of the British English coordinate response measure speech-in-noise test as an occupational hearing assessment tool.英式英语协调反应测听言语噪声测试作为职业听力评估工具的开发与评估
Int J Audiol. 2017 Oct;56(10):749-758. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1317370. Epub 2017 May 24.
10
Noise-induced hearing loss profile among Taiwan Airforce on duty pilots.台湾空军现役飞行员噪声性听力损失情况
Am J Otolaryngol. 2023 May-Jun;44(3):103802. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.103802. Epub 2023 Feb 27.