• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Masking Level Difference: test-retest reliability assessment in normal hearing female university students.掩蔽级差:正常听力女大学生的重测信度评估。
Codas. 2022 Jan 7;34(3):e20200207. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20212020207. eCollection 2022.
2
Development of a 500-Hz masking-level difference protocol for clinic use.用于临床的500赫兹掩蔽级差协议的开发。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2003;14(1):1-8. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.14.1.2.
3
Masking-level differences in the elderly: a comparison of antiphasic and time-delay dichotic conditions.老年人的掩蔽级差异:反相和延时双耳分听条件的比较。
J Speech Hear Res. 1991 Dec;34(6):1410-22. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3406.1410.
4
Word-recognition performance in interrupted noise by young listeners with normal hearing and older listeners with hearing loss.听力正常的年轻听众和有听力损失的老年听众在间歇性噪声中的单词识别表现。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2010 Feb;21(2):90-109. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.21.2.4.
5
Masking level difference among brazilian military personnel: a comparison between pilots and non-pilots.巴西军人之间的掩蔽水平差异:飞行员和非飞行员之间的比较。
Int J Audiol. 2021 Dec;60(12):1016-1022. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1909759. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
6
Masking level differences: auditory evoked responses with homophasic and antiphasic signal and noise.掩蔽级差异:同相和反相信号与噪声下的听觉诱发电位
J Speech Hear Res. 1979 Jun;22(2):403-11. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2202406.
7
Test-retest reliability of the Toy Discrimination Test with a masker of noise or babble in children with hearing impairment.噪声或混响掩蔽条件下玩具识别测试在听力障碍儿童中的重测信度。
Int J Audiol. 2013 Jun;52(6):377-84. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.769064. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
8
[The psychoacoustic phenomenon of masking level differences in the human subject studied by auditory evoked potentials].[通过听觉诱发电位研究人类受试者中掩蔽级差的心理声学现象]
Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova. 1988 Mar-Apr;38(2):225-32.
9
The effects of energetic and informational masking on The Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).能量掩蔽和信息掩蔽对噪声中的单词测试(WIN)的影响。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2012 Jul-Aug;23(7):522-33. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.23.7.4.
10
Improving Sensitivity of the Digits-In-Noise Test Using Antiphasic Stimuli.使用反相刺激提高数字噪声测试的灵敏度
Ear Hear. 2020 Mar/Apr;41(2):442-450. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000775.

引用本文的文献

1
A Study on the Reference Values and Cutoff Criteria of Masking Level Difference for Children Aged 7-12 Years.7至12岁儿童掩蔽级差参考值及截断标准的研究
J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 7;11(18):5282. doi: 10.3390/jcm11185282.

本文引用的文献

1
Masking Level Difference and Electrophysiological Evaluation in Adults with Normal Hearing.正常听力成年人的掩蔽级差与电生理评估
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Oct;24(4):e399-e406. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1701266. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
2
Masking Level Difference in schoolchildren: environmental analysis.学童的掩蔽级差:环境分析
Codas. 2018 Jun 11;30(3):e20170048. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20182017048.
3
Contribution of binaural masking release to improved speech intelligibility for different masker types.双耳掩蔽释放对不同掩蔽类型下言语可懂度提高的贡献。
Eur J Neurosci. 2020 Mar;51(5):1339-1352. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13980. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
4
Psychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity.工具评估中的信度和效度的心理测量特性。
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2017 Jul-Sep;26(3):649-659. doi: 10.5123/S1679-49742017000300022.
5
Normative data for diagnosing auditory processing disorder in Norwegian children aged 7-12 years.挪威7至12岁儿童听觉处理障碍诊断的规范数据。
Int J Audiol. 2018 Jan;57(1):10-20. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1366670. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
6
Central limit theorem: the cornerstone of modern statistics.中心极限定理:现代统计学的基石。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2017 Apr;70(2):144-156. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2017.70.2.144. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
7
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.可靠性研究中组内相关系数选择与报告指南
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
8
Development of the auditory system.听觉系统的发育。
Handb Clin Neurol. 2015;129:55-72. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-62630-1.00003-2.
9
Development of auditory processing in 6- to 11-yr-old children.6 至 11 岁儿童听觉处理能力的发展。
Ear Hear. 2011 May-Jun;32(3):269-85. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318201c468.
10
Introduction to health measurement scales.健康测量量表简介。
J Psychosom Res. 2010 Apr;68(4):319-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.01.006.

掩蔽级差:正常听力女大学生的重测信度评估。

Masking Level Difference: test-retest reliability assessment in normal hearing female university students.

机构信息

Departamento de Fonoaudiologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ - Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brasil.

Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Reabilitação, Departamento de Fisioterapia, Fonoaudiologia e Terapia Ocupacional, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo - USP - São Paulo (SP), Brasil.

出版信息

Codas. 2022 Jan 7;34(3):e20200207. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20212020207. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1590/2317-1782/20212020207
PMID:35019083
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9851185/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To verify the test-retest reliability of the Masking Level Difference in normal hearing female university students.

METHODS

Prospective descriptive study with 78 young female adults without hearing complaints, submitted to the compact disc version of the Masking Level Difference by Auditec of Saint Louis. The threshold was determined by the difference between signal-to-noise ratios at hearing thresholds found in the antiphasic and homophasic conditions. The test was applied by the same examiner in two moments (test and retest) with an interval of seven to 14 days between them. Inferential statistical analysis included comparison of test and retest situations using Student's t test for paired samples, calculation of the intraclass correlation coefficient and calculation of 95% confidence intervals for signal-to-noise ratios at hearing thresholds found in the antiphasic and homophasic conditions and for masking level difference.

RESULTS

The average signal-to-noise ratio at hearing threshold ​​in the homophasic condition was -12.59 dB and -12.46 dB in the Test and Retest situations, respectively, and -21.54 dB and -21.08 dB in the antiphasic condition. The average value ​​in the final Masking Level Difference result was 8.95 dB in the Test and 8.74 dB in the Retest. Intraclass correlation coefficient values ​​obtained were 0.436, 0.625 and 0.577 for homophasic, antiphasic and Masking Level Difference conditions, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The Masking Level Difference showed moderate test-retest reliability in normal hearing adults female university students.

摘要

目的

验证正常听力女性大学生的掩蔽级差的重测信度。

方法

前瞻性描述性研究,共纳入 78 名无听力投诉的年轻成年女性,使用 Auditec 圣路易斯的光盘版进行掩蔽级差测试。阈值通过在反相和同相条件下发现的听力阈值的信噪比差值确定。测试由同一位检查者在两个时间点(测试和复测)进行,两次测试之间的间隔为 7 至 14 天。推断性统计分析包括使用配对样本 Student's t 检验比较测试和复测情况,计算同相和反相条件下听力阈值的信噪比以及掩蔽级差的组内相关系数,并计算 95%置信区间。

结果

同相条件下听力阈值的平均信噪比分别为测试和复测时的-12.59dB 和-12.46dB,反相条件下为-21.54dB 和-21.08dB。最终掩蔽级差结果的平均数值分别为测试时的 8.95dB 和复测时的 8.74dB。同相、反相和掩蔽级差条件下获得的组内相关系数值分别为 0.436、0.625 和 0.577。

结论

在正常听力的成年女性大学生中,掩蔽级差显示出中等程度的重测信度。