Neuhäuser G, Vogl J
Eur J Pediatr. 1980 May;133(3):243-50. doi: 10.1007/BF00496084.
Measurement of various craniofacial structures was compared with clinical assessment of craniofacial anomalies. Different diagnostic groups of children were studied. Anomalies were seen more often in patients with congenital heart defect, mental retardation and multiple congenital anomalies syndromes than in control children. Comparative study of quantitative data and qualitative (clinical) assessment showed some agreement but also many discrepancies. Therefore, in describing craniofacial anomalies both methods should be used. This is particularly true in the differential diagnosis of multiple congenital anomalies syndromes and variant familial developmental patterns.
将各种颅面结构的测量结果与颅面异常的临床评估进行了比较。对不同诊断组的儿童进行了研究。与对照儿童相比，先天性心脏缺陷、智力迟钝和多发性先天性异常综合征患者中出现异常的情况更为常见。定量数据与定性（临床）评估的比较研究显示出一些一致性，但也存在许多差异。因此，在描述颅面异常时，两种方法都应使用。这在多发性先天性异常综合征和变异型家族性发育模式的鉴别诊断中尤为如此。
