• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

污名会塑造口吃者吗?

Does the stigma shape the stutterer?

作者信息

Woods C L

出版信息

J Commun Disord. 1978 Dec;11(6):483-7. doi: 10.1016/0021-9924(78)90022-9.

DOI:10.1016/0021-9924(78)90022-9
PMID:739063
Abstract

The Woods and Williams' (1976) study of Iowans' stereotypes about stuttering males was replicated using 11 speech clinicians and 16 classroom teachers in Virginia. Ratings of 23 possible characteristics were obtained for four hypothetical concepts (typical 8-year-old male, typical 8-year-old male stutter, typical adult male, and typical adult male stutterer) using a semantic differential format. The results of the Woods and Williams' (1976) research were confirmed. Stutters were expected by all rating groups to be more nonassertive, tense, insecure, and afraid to talk than nonstutterers. Not only were stereotype differences within professional groups quite small from one geographical region to the other, but classroom teachers held particularly unfavorable stereotypes of the stuttering boy in both studies. These results suggest the possibility that listener reactions could shape the stutterer's behavior.

摘要

伍兹和威廉姆斯(1976年)对爱荷华州人关于口吃男性刻板印象的研究,在弗吉尼亚州由11名言语治疗师和16名教师进行了复制。使用语义差异量表,对四个假设概念(典型的8岁男性、典型的8岁口吃男性、典型的成年男性和典型的成年口吃者)的23个可能特征进行了评级。伍兹和威廉姆斯(1976年)的研究结果得到了证实。所有评级组都认为,口吃者比非口吃者更不自信、更紧张、更缺乏安全感,也更害怕说话。不仅不同专业组内的刻板印象差异在不同地理区域间非常小,而且在两项研究中,教师对口吃男孩都持有特别负面的刻板印象。这些结果表明,听众的反应可能会对口吃者的行为产生影响。

相似文献

1
Does the stigma shape the stutterer?污名会塑造口吃者吗?
J Commun Disord. 1978 Dec;11(6):483-7. doi: 10.1016/0021-9924(78)90022-9.
2
Traits attributed to stuttering and normally fluent males.归因于口吃男性和正常流利男性的特质。
J Speech Hear Res. 1976 Jun;19(2):267-78. doi: 10.1044/jshr.1902.267.
3
Origins of the stuttering stereotype: stereotype formation through anchoring-adjustment.口吃刻板印象的起源:通过锚定调整形成刻板印象。
J Fluency Disord. 2007;32(4):297-309. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2007.03.003. Epub 2007 Apr 3.
4
Speech clinicians' attribution of personality traits as a function of stuttering severity.言语临床医生将人格特质归因于口吃严重程度的情况。
J Speech Hear Res. 1979 Mar;22(1):37-45. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2201.37.
5
Perceptions of people who stutter: re-assessing the negative stereotype.口吃者的认知:重新评估负面刻板印象。
Percept Mot Skills. 2001 Apr;92(2):551-9. doi: 10.2466/pms.2001.92.2.551.
6
Stereotype formation by inference: a possible explanation for the "stutterer" stereotype.通过推理形成刻板印象:对“口吃者”刻板印象的一种可能解释。
J Speech Hear Res. 1984 Dec;27(4):567-70. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2704.567.
7
The Effects of Different Sources of Stuttering Disclosure on the Perceptions of a Child Who Stutters.不同口吃披露源对口吃儿童感知的影响。
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2020 Jul 15;51(3):745-760. doi: 10.1044/2020_LSHSS-19-00059. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
8
The relationship between communication attitude, anxiety, and depression in stutterers and nonstutterers.
J Speech Hear Res. 1992 Aug;35(4):789-98. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3504.789.
9
Stuttering in Lima, Peru: a qualitative case study of current concepts, theories, and treatment facilities.秘鲁利马的口吃现象:关于当前概念、理论及治疗机构的定性案例研究
J Commun Disord. 1980 Jul;13(4):263-76. doi: 10.1016/0021-9924(80)90009-x.
10
The impact of causal attribution on stigmatizing attitudes toward a person who stutters.因果归因对口吃者污名化态度的影响。
J Commun Disord. 2016 Mar-Apr;60:14-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Feb 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Social and Cognitive Impressions of Adults Who Do and Do Not Stutter Based on Listeners' Perceptions of Read-Speech Samples.基于听众对朗读语音样本的认知,对口吃和非口吃成年人的社会及认知印象。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 11;8:1148. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01148. eCollection 2017.