Weinberg T S
J Homosex. 1978 Winter;4(2):143-56. doi: 10.1300/j082v04n02_02.
The possible relationships between sexual behavior and homosexual male self-identity are examined within a symbolic interactionist frame-work. The presence or absence of definitions of homosexuality, the nature of these definitions, and the rules learned by the individual for their application to himself and others determined how he perceived his feelings, his behavior, and his sexual identity. The identity histories of the men illustrate how the peer groups in which they were socialized and the behavior of their friends prevented them from defining their behavior in terms of the "homosexual pattern." They began to reinterpret their behavior as "homosexual" when they perceived changes in the behavior and definitions of their behavior by their friends, or when they came into contact with self-defined homosexuals.
本文在象征互动主义的框架内,探讨了性行为与男同性恋者自我认同之间可能存在的关系。同性恋定义的有无、这些定义的性质,以及个体学到的将其应用于自身和他人的规则,决定了他如何看待自己的情感、行为和性身份。这些男性的身份形成历程表明,他们成长过程中所处的同龄群体以及朋友的行为,使他们无法依据“同性恋模式”来界定自己的行为。当他们察觉到朋友行为及对其行为定义的变化,或者当他们接触到自我认定的同性恋者时,便开始将自己的行为重新诠释为“同性恋行为”。