Shwartz M
Cancer. 1980 Aug 15;46(4):844-51. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19800815)46:4<844::aid-cncr2820460434>3.0.co;2-5.
Assume that the benefit of screening for breast cancer with a combination of mammography and a clinical examination is measured by comparing the five-year survival rate of women detected by screening to the five-year survival rate of women surface clinically with breast cancer, e.g., to the survival rate of women reported in End Results In Cancer. In this paper a mathematical model is used to estimate the percentage of the observed difference in five-year survival rates between women in these two groups that is due to lead time and length bias. For women detected at an initial screen, the best estimate is that about 50% of the observed difference is due to bias and 50% to earlier detection. However, the percent due to bias may be as low as 20% and as high as 72%. These estimates are relatively insensitive to the age of the women screened. For women detected at a second screen given one year later, the estimated percentage of the observed difference in survival rates between women detected at the screen and a control group that is due to bias is between 33 and 42%.
假设通过乳房X线摄影和临床检查相结合的方式筛查乳腺癌的益处是通过比较筛查发现的女性的五年生存率与临床表面患有乳腺癌的女性的五年生存率来衡量的,例如,与癌症最终结果报告的女性生存率进行比较。在本文中,使用数学模型来估计这两组女性五年生存率观察到的差异中,由领先时间和长度偏倚导致的百分比。对于在初次筛查时被检测出的女性,最佳估计是观察到的差异中约50%是由于偏倚,50%是由于早期检测。然而,由于偏倚导致的百分比可能低至20%,高至72%。这些估计对接受筛查女性的年龄相对不敏感。对于在一年后的第二次筛查中被检测出的女性,在筛查发现的女性与对照组之间观察到的生存率差异中,由于偏倚导致的估计百分比在33%至42%之间。