• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Lead-time bias in esophageal cancer screening in high-risk areas in China.中国高危地区食管癌筛查中的领先时间偏倚。
Chin J Cancer Res. 2020 Aug;32(4):467-475. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2020.04.04.
2
[Cost-effectiveness analysis of esophageal cancer once-in-a-lifetime endoscopic screening in high-risk areas of rural China].[中国农村食管癌高发区一次性内镜筛查的成本效益分析]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2015 Jun;37(6):476-80.
3
Estimated Cost-effectiveness of Endoscopic Screening for Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer in High-Risk Areas in China.中国高危地区上消化道癌内镜筛查的成本效益估计
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2121403. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.21403.
4
Long-term effectiveness of one-time endoscopic screening for esophageal cancer: A community-based study in rural China.一次性内镜筛查食管癌的长期效果:中国农村社区为基础的研究。
Cancer. 2020 Oct 15;126(20):4511-4520. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33119. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
5
Efficacy of endoscopic screening for esophageal cancer in China (ESECC): design and preliminary results of a population-based randomised controlled trial.中国内镜筛查食管癌的疗效(ESECC):一项基于人群的随机对照试验的设计和初步结果。
Gut. 2019 Feb;68(2):198-206. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315520. Epub 2018 Jan 6.
6
Cost-effectiveness of risk-stratified endoscopic screening for esophageal cancer in high-risk areas of China: a modeling study.中国高危地区食管癌风险分层内镜筛查的成本效益:建模研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Feb;95(2):225-235.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.08.008. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
7
Massive Endoscopic Screening for Esophageal and Gastric Cancers in a High-Risk Area of China.中国高风险地区食管癌和胃癌的大规模内镜筛查
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 23;10(12):e0145097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145097. eCollection 2015.
8
[Analysis of the effects of esophageal cancer screening in Henan rural areas with cancer screening program, 2014-2018].[2014 - 2018年河南省农村地区癌症筛查项目中食管癌筛查效果分析]
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Feb 6;55(2):184-188. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20200320-00398.
9
Effectiveness of Intensive Endoscopic Screening for Esophageal Cancer in China: A Community-Based Study.中国强化内镜筛查食管癌的效果:一项基于社区的研究。
Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Apr 1;188(4):776-784. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwy291.
10
Esophageal Histological Precursor Lesions and Subsequent 8.5-Year Cancer Risk in a Population-Based Prospective Study in China.中国一项基于人群的前瞻性研究中食管组织学前驱病变及其随后 8.5 年的癌症风险。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2020 Jul;115(7):1036-1044. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000640.

引用本文的文献

1
A study on expression level and nutritional status of IGFBP-2 after left neck anastomosis combined with placement of feeding nutritional applicators carrying ^(125)I particles in the treatment of esophageal cancer.左颈部吻合联合植入含¹²⁵I粒子的营养喂养器治疗食管癌后IGFBP - 2表达水平及营养状况的研究
Front Oncol. 2022 Dec 6;12:1085305. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1085305. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
The National Cohort of Esophageal Cancer-Prospective Cohort Study of Esophageal Cancer and Precancerous Lesions based on High-Risk Population in China (NCEC-HRP): study protocol.中国高危人群食管癌前瞻性队列研究-食管癌及癌前病变的全国队列研究(NCEC-HRP):研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 3;9(4):e027360. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027360.
2
Colorectal cancer screening for average-risk adults: 2018 guideline update from the American Cancer Society.美国癌症协会 2018 年普通风险成年人结直肠癌筛查指南更新
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jul;68(4):250-281. doi: 10.3322/caac.21457. Epub 2018 May 30.
3
Efficacy of endoscopic screening for esophageal cancer in China (ESECC): design and preliminary results of a population-based randomised controlled trial.中国内镜筛查食管癌的疗效(ESECC):一项基于人群的随机对照试验的设计和初步结果。
Gut. 2019 Feb;68(2):198-206. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315520. Epub 2018 Jan 6.
4
[Analysis of the incidence and age characteristics of upper gastrointestinal cancer among 2003-2012 in the high incidence area of esophageal cancer, Cixian County, in Hebei Province].[河北省磁县食管癌高发区2003 - 2012年上消化道癌发病情况及年龄特征分析]
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2017 May 6;51(5):398-402. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2017.05.006.
5
Cancer screening in the United States, 2017: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening.美国 2017 年癌症筛查:对当前美国癌症协会指南和癌症筛查当前问题的回顾。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Mar;67(2):100-121. doi: 10.3322/caac.21392. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
6
Esophageal cancer in high-risk areas of China: research progress and challenges.中国食管癌高发区:研究进展与挑战
Ann Epidemiol. 2017 Mar;27(3):215-221. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.11.004. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
7
EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent.EAU-ESTRO-SIOG 前列腺癌诊治指南。第 1 部分:筛查、诊断及有治愈意图的局部治疗。
Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):618-629. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
8
Esophageal cancer statistics in China, 2011: Estimates based on 177 cancer registries.中国食管癌统计数据,2011 年:基于 177 个癌症登记处的估计。
Thorac Cancer. 2016 Mar;7(2):232-7. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12322. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
9
Incidence and mortality rate of esophageal cancer has decreased during past 40 years in Hebei Province, China.在过去40年里,中国河北省食管癌的发病率和死亡率有所下降。
Chin J Cancer Res. 2015 Dec;27(6):562-71. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.1000-9604.2015.10.06.
10
Surveillance endoscopy is associated with improved outcomes of oesophageal adenocarcinoma detected in patients with Barrett's oesophagus.监测内镜检查与 Barrett 食管患者中检测到的食管腺癌的改善结局相关。
Gut. 2016 Aug;65(8):1252-60. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308865. Epub 2015 Aug 26.

中国高危地区食管癌筛查中的领先时间偏倚。

Lead-time bias in esophageal cancer screening in high-risk areas in China.

作者信息

Yang Zhao, Wong Irene Ol, Deng Wei, Chen Ru, Zhou Jiachen, Wei Wenqiang

机构信息

School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China.

Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China.

出版信息

Chin J Cancer Res. 2020 Aug;32(4):467-475. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2020.04.04.

DOI:10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2020.04.04
PMID:32963459
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7491548/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate what extent lead-time bias is likely to affect endoscopic screening effectiveness for esophageal cancer in the high-risk area in China.

METHODS

A screening model based on the epidemiological cancer registry data, yielding a population-level incidence and mortality rates, was carried out to simulate study participants in the high-risk area in China, and investigate the effect of lead-time bias on endoscopic screening with control for length bias.

RESULTS

Of 100,000 participants, 6,150 (6.15%) were diagnosed with esophageal squamous dysplasia during the 20-year follow-up period. The estimated lead time ranged from 1.67 to 5.78 years, with a median time of 4.62 years [interquartile range (IQR): 4.07-5.11 years] in the high-risk area in China. Lead-time bias exaggerated screening effectiveness severely, causing more than a 10% overestimation in 5-year cause-specific survival rate and around a 43% reduction in cause-specific hazard ratio. The magnitude of lead-time bias on endoscopic screening for esophageal cancer varied depending on the screening strategies, in which an inverted U-shaped and U-shaped effects were observed in the 5-year cause-specific survival rate and cause-specific hazard ratio respectively concerning a range of ages for primary screening.

CONCLUSIONS

Lead-time bias, usually causing an overestimation of screening effectiveness, is an elementary and fundamental issue in cancer screening. Quantification and correction of lead-time bias are essential when evaluating the effectiveness of endoscopic screening in the high-risk area in China.

摘要

目的

探讨领先时间偏倚在多大程度上可能影响中国高风险地区食管癌内镜筛查的效果。

方法

基于癌症流行病学登记数据建立一个筛查模型,得出人群水平的发病率和死亡率,用于模拟中国高风险地区的研究参与者,并在控制长度偏倚的情况下研究领先时间偏倚对内镜筛查的影响。

结果

在100,000名参与者中,6150名(6.15%)在20年随访期内被诊断为食管鳞状上皮发育异常。在中国高风险地区,估计的领先时间为1.67至5.78年,中位时间为4.62年[四分位间距(IQR):4.07 - 5.11年]。领先时间偏倚严重夸大了筛查效果,导致5年病因特异性生存率高估超过10%,病因特异性风险比降低约43%。食管癌内镜筛查中领先时间偏倚的程度因筛查策略而异,其中在不同年龄范围的初次筛查中,5年病因特异性生存率和病因特异性风险比分别呈现倒U形和U形效应。

结论

领先时间偏倚通常会导致对筛查效果的高估,是癌症筛查中的一个基本问题。在中国高风险地区评估内镜筛查效果时,对领先时间偏倚进行量化和校正至关重要。