Suppr超能文献

皮下植入技术的方法学评估。

Methodological assessments of subcutaneous implantation techniques.

作者信息

Marion L, Haugen E, Mjör I A

出版信息

J Biomed Mater Res. 1980 Jul;14(4):343-57. doi: 10.1002/jbm.820140402.

Abstract

Results from 197 subcutaneous implants on rats and 40 on mice of three different dental biomaterials were studied with emphasis on methodological evaluations. The types of implants employed allowed a differentiation between the materials based on the tissue reactions induced, but the degree of response recorded depended on the technique and the animal employed. The main problems encountered were the effect of operative trauma in short-term experiments, loss of material/tissue interface, dislodgement of tearing of sections if the materials remained in situ, folding and distortion of tissue, and difficulties in orientation of specimens for sectioning. The tube implant supplied with a window and sectioned perpendicularly on the long axis of the tube gave the least methodological problems. This "window technique" is therefore recommended as the method of choice for subcutaneous implantations. Cell density evaluations allowed quantitative determinations of the cellular response.

摘要

研究了三种不同牙科生物材料在197只大鼠和40只小鼠皮下植入的结果,重点是方法学评估。所用植入物的类型能够根据诱导的组织反应区分材料,但记录的反应程度取决于技术和所用动物。遇到的主要问题包括短期实验中手术创伤的影响、材料/组织界面的丧失、如果材料留在原位则切片时的移位或撕裂、组织的折叠和变形以及切片标本定向的困难。带有窗口并沿管的长轴垂直切片的管形植入物产生的方法学问题最少。因此,推荐这种“窗口技术”作为皮下植入的首选方法。细胞密度评估允许对细胞反应进行定量测定。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验