Schwoon D R, Angermeyer M C
Br J Med Psychol. 1980 Sep;53(3):255-65. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1980.tb02549.x.
Following the phenomenological approach to interaction in psychiatrically disturbed families a personality questionnaire ('Giessen Test') was used to assess the views three family members (father, mother, son) had of themselves and of each other. These views may be regarded as quite stable results of interaction processes, so that conclusions about family interaction patterns may be drawn from the level of concordance of any two of them. Comparisons were made between families in which a son had been hospitalized for the first time with a diagnosis of schizophrenia and those in which a son had been hospitalized for surgical treatment, n = 30 in each category. The psychiatric patients did not on the whole give distorted personality descriptions. But in the index families the relationship between father and son was found characteristically different from that in the control families. This fact is interpreted as a reaction of the father to the deviant behaviour of the son, who did not conform with the male sex-role expectations of the father. The father as it is could not then identify with his son as a father usually does and perhaps necessarily should. The answers of the mothers partly confirm this conclusion. With regard to the parental dyad, the findings suggest that the fathers' needs for reciprocal consideration are not met by their wives.
遵循针对精神障碍家庭中互动的现象学方法,使用一份人格问卷(“吉森测试”)来评估三名家庭成员(父亲、母亲、儿子)对自己及彼此的看法。这些看法可被视为互动过程相当稳定的结果,从而可以从其中任意两人的一致性水平得出关于家庭互动模式的结论。对儿子首次因精神分裂症诊断而住院的家庭与儿子因外科治疗而住院的家庭进行了比较,每组各有30个家庭。总体而言,精神科患者并未给出扭曲的人格描述。但在指标家庭中,发现父子关系与对照家庭中的父子关系存在显著差异。这一事实被解释为父亲对儿子偏差行为的反应,儿子不符合父亲对男性性别角色的期望。这样一来,父亲无法像通常且或许必然应该的那样认同自己的儿子。母亲的回答部分证实了这一结论。关于父母二元组,研究结果表明,父亲对相互体谅的需求未得到妻子的满足。