Bjerregaard P
Biotelem Patient Monit. 1980;7(2):83-95.
The frequency response and speed stability of a widely used tape recorder (Oxford Medilog) and arrhythmia computer (Reynolds Pathfinder) was evaluated and measurement in time and amplitude on the ambulatory ECG compared with correspondent measurement in the conventional ECG. The overall bandwidth was 0.15--33Hz (3 dB down) and the mean speed error +2% +/- 1.8%. There was no statistically significant difference between P-Q and Q-T intervals measured by the 2 methods, but a significant reduction in wave amplitudes in the ambulatory ECG. The demarcation of QRS complexes was often blurred in the ambulatory ECG and borderline complexes difficult to classify as normal or abnormal on QRS width alone. Artifical J point depression was a common finding in the ambulatory ECT, whereas horizontal or downsloping ST segment depression was faithfully reproduced.
对一种广泛使用的磁带记录仪(牛津Medilog)和心律失常计算机(雷诺兹探路者)的频率响应和速度稳定性进行了评估,并在动态心电图上进行了时间和幅度测量,同时与常规心电图的相应测量结果进行了比较。整体带宽为0.15--33Hz(3dB衰减),平均速度误差为+2% +/- 1.8%。两种方法测量的P-Q和Q-T间期之间无统计学显著差异,但动态心电图中的波幅显著降低。动态心电图中QRS波群的分界常常模糊不清,仅根据QRS宽度难以将临界波群分类为正常或异常。人工J点压低是动态心电图中的常见表现,而水平或下斜型ST段压低则能如实再现。