Letournel E
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980 Sep(151):81-106.
Twenty-two years of experience in this field allow us to say that a perfect open reduction is the method of choice to treat displaced acetabular fractures. But difficult cases require experience. Late follow-up of hips treated by open reduction and internal fixation supports the contention that a satisfactory outcome can be expected if the fracture reduction is perfect. The converse applies, and in some instances it would have been better to accept the result which might have been obtained by conservative methods. The type of fracture dictates the choice of approach, but the indication for operative treatment as well as the result of acetabular fracture treatment is the degree of congruence achieved between the acetabulum and the femoral head. Incongruence may be total, partial or apparent. Total incongruence is seen in both persistent posterior or central dislocation in which, on all three standard radiographs, the fragments of the acetabulum are seen separated from the femoral head. The situation may exist from the moment of trauma or following attempts at reduction. In all instances, operative treatment is indicated. With partial incongruence, the femoral head lies well centered beneath an undisplaced fragment of roof, but other fragments of articular surface remain displaced. A very good clinical result cannot be expected in more than 55% of hips left in this state, and neglecting operative complications, the same can be expected following conservative management. A small degree of incongruence can be accepted but one of the difficulties lies in determining the size of the fragment "roof" left in situ. Certainly, congruency seen on one standard radiograph and not in the others must not be accepted, and surgical treatment is indicated. With apparent congruence, the fragments of shattered acetabulum have regrouped around a displaced femoral head and exhibit a fair degree of congruence in this displaced position. Examples like this can often be treated conservatively because while surgery may achieve a better true congruence, this cannot be guaranteed and will be accompanied by the risks of operation. Further, the result could be worse. In nine acetabular fractures, it has been possible to achieve an apparent congruence by reconstituting displaced acetabular fragments around the femoral head but accepting the overall displacement. Seven of these obtained very good clinical results but it should be emphasized that the need to resort to this approach has been very infrequent.
在该领域22年的经验让我们可以说,对于移位的髋臼骨折,完美的切开复位是首选治疗方法。但复杂病例需要经验。对采用切开复位内固定治疗的髋关节进行长期随访支持了这样的观点:如果骨折复位完美,可预期获得满意的结果。反之亦然,在某些情况下,接受保守治疗可能取得的结果或许会更好。骨折类型决定入路的选择,但髋臼骨折手术治疗的指征以及治疗结果是髋臼与股骨头之间实现的匹配程度。不匹配可能是完全性、部分性或假性的。完全不匹配见于持续性后脱位或中心脱位,在所有三张标准X线片上,均可看到髋臼碎片与股骨头分离。这种情况可能在受伤时就已存在,也可能发生在复位尝试之后。在所有情况下,均需进行手术治疗。部分不匹配时,股骨头位于未移位的髋臼顶碎片下方的中心位置,但关节面的其他碎片仍有移位。处于这种状态的髋关节,超过55%无法预期获得非常好的临床结果,且忽略手术并发症的情况下,保守治疗的结果也是如此。可接受小程度的不匹配,但困难之一在于确定留在原位的“髋臼顶”碎片大小。当然,不能接受仅在一张标准X线片上显示匹配而其他片子不匹配的情况,此时需进行手术治疗。假性匹配时,粉碎的髋臼碎片围绕移位的股骨头重新组合,并在这个移位位置呈现出一定程度的匹配。这样的例子通常可保守治疗,因为虽然手术可能实现更好的真正匹配,但无法保证,且会伴有手术风险。此外,结果可能更差。在9例髋臼骨折中,通过围绕股骨头重新构建移位的髋臼碎片但接受整体移位,实现了假性匹配。其中7例获得了非常好的临床结果,但应强调的是,采用这种方法的情况非常少见。